Some Big Obama Donors Slow to Warm to Clinton

Clinton has already spent more than $129 million on the primary and may be looking to deep-pocketed donors to step up for a general-election run.

Updated on
90183287

Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton speaks at a debate watch party on April 14, 2016, in New York City.

Photographer: Justin Sullivan/Getty Images

Hillary Clinton has repeatedly said that she's better positioned than her rival Democrat Bernie Sanders to carry on President Barack Obama's legacy. But some of Obama's biggest financial supporters have yet to buy in.

At least 33 of the 145 political donors who gave $25,000 or more in 2012 to Priorities USA, the super-PAC that backed Obama's re-election and now supports Clinton's bid, have yet to contribute to either Clinton's campaign or affiliated outside committees, according to a Bloomberg analysis of the most recently available Federal Election Commission records.

Those donors' hesitancy has hardly impeded Clinton's ability to amass a record war chest: her campaign and the groups backing her had raised at least $223 million as of the end of February, more than any other candidate in either party, according to the Center for Responsive Politics. However, it does show that some members of the established Democratic donor class—not just the legions of small donors fueling Sanders' campaign—aren't sold on Clinton's candidacy.

Vin Ryan, the founder of the Boston-based private-equity firm Schooner Capital who has contributed $2.5 million to political groups since 1992, gave $100,000 to Priorities USA in 2012 and is now supporting Sanders, so far with two $500 donations.

Sanders “has focused on the real issues facing our nation,” including income inequality, access to health care and the influence of money on politics, said Ryan. “He's pulled Hillary in that direction.”

Some longtime Democratic donors have been quiet so far, including trial lawyer and Baltimore Orioles owner Peter Angelos, Sun Microsystems co-founder Vinod Khosla, and former San Francisco Giants CEO Bill Neukom. And the Clinton and Sanders campaigns are neck-and-neck in terms of fundraising: as of March, Clinton has raised $189 million while Sanders has brought in $184 million.

Meanwhile, Clinton has already spent more than $129 million on the primary and may be looking to deep-pocketed donors like these to step up for a general-election run. Her campaign said it had $29 million in the bank as of April 1.

Pro-Clinton outside groups, including super-PACs Priorities USA, American Bridge 21st Century, Correct the Record and Ready PAC, have spent little on the primary and have about $44 million on hand, FEC records show.

“We set ambitious goals to ensure we'd have the resources we need to win a competitive primary and we've blown past every goal,” said Josh Schwerin, a spokesman for the campaign, who noted that half of its support had come through small, online donations. “We've out-raised every opponent,” he added, “and are even ahead of President Obama's 2012 pace for primary fundraising.”

Through the end of February, Clinton's campaign had raised about $18 million more than Obama had by the same point in 2012. However, Obama didn't face a primary challenger, so he had $104 million on hand in April 2012, more than triple what Clinton now has in the bank.

Ryan isn't the only past Priorities USA donor to support Sanders. Investor Henry Jarecki and video-game designer Alex Rigopulos, who each gave about $100,000 to Priorities USA in 2012, haven't contributed to the super-PAC this cycle but gave the maximum $2,700 to Sanders' campaign. Dick Harpootlian, a former chairman of the Democratic National Committee who gave $25,000 to Obama's re-election, has endorsed the Vermont senator.

“The mood of the country and the mood of the party have changed,” Harpootlian said. “And she hasn't changed.”

Sandor Straus, a former partner at hedge fund Renaissance Technologies, has given to both Democratic candidates. In February 2015, Straus contributed $100,000 to American Bridge, the opposition research super-PAC founded by Clinton supporter David Brock, and in July of that year sent $500 to Sanders.

Phone calls seeking comment from Angelos, Jarecki, and Rigopulos weren't returned. Khosla, Neukom and Straus declined to comment.

Angelos, who supported Clinton when she was in the Senate through her leadership PAC and re-election campaign, hasn't contributed to her presidential run. Angelos gave $272,000 last year to a group trying to persuade Vice President Joe Biden to enter the 2016 race. In 2012, Angelos gave $500,000 to Priorities USA and the maximum $2,500 to Obama for the primary and general election. He also supported Bill Clinton's presidential re-election effort in 1996, giving $2,000 to the campaign and another $100,000 to the DNC.

There are signs that some money could start to flow should Clinton win the primary. Ken Levine, president and chief executive officer of data security firm Digital Guardian, said he made a contribution to Clinton's campaign at the end of March, but isn't sure whether he'll support any of her super-PACs.

Levine, who gave $50,000 to Priorities USA and $61,600 to the DNC in the 2012 election cycle, said that he thinks Clinton is well-qualified to be president, but is concerned that she won't inspire the kind of turnout needed to win a general election.

“There's definitely a palpable excitement gap,” Levine said, adding that he might be driven to give as much as he did in 2012 if he dislikes the Republican nominee enough. “After the primary, I may wind up saying, ‘Let's do it.’”

(Corrects Bill Neukom's title in sixth paragraph.)
Before it's here, it's on the Bloomberg Terminal. LEARN MORE