How Much Surplus Labor Do We Have?
Janet Yellen wants the hawks in the Federal Reserve System to cut her some slack on the topic of slack. As economists use the term, slack in the job market is a measure of labor supply. Too much slack means high unemployment. Too little means worker shortages, spiking wages, and inflation. Whether there’s too much slack, too little, or just the right amount has been a topic of intense debate since well before Yellen’s scheduled Aug. 22 speech on labor markets at the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City’s annual conference in Jackson Hole, Wyo.
Yellen, in her first year as chair of the Fed’s board of governors, is a slacker—she says the labor market remains soft and the central bank should keep concentrating on growth, not restraining inflation. She’s up against a group of hawks such as Charles Plosser, president of the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia, who say the slack is all but used up. Both sides cite official statistics to make their cases. “There’s lots of asymmetry out there in the data right now,” says Neil Dutta, head of U.S. economics at Renaissance Macro Research.
Doves on the rate-setting Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) play down the falling unemployment rate (6.2 percent in July) because, as they point out, it counts only people who are actively seeking work. The 2007-09 recession was so deep that many people stopped looking. Employment as a share of the adult population remains depressed. The dovish theory is that if demand heats up, many of those people will be drawn back into the workforce.
Easy-money advocates point to the high number of people—7.5 million—who want full-time jobs but are working part-time for economic reasons like “unfavorable business conditions.” Before the recession began, there were only 4.6 million people in that situation. In a recent speech, Minneapolis Fed President Narayana Kocherlakota cited involuntary part-timers as evidence that plenty of workers are on the sidelines, ready to fill increased demand for labor.
The Fed chair has managed to keep most of the FOMC on her side. After its latest meeting on July 30, the committee said in a statement that “a range of labor market indicators suggests that there remains significant underutilization of labor resources.” All of the Fed governors in Washington lean dovish, as do presidents of the regional banks in New York, Chicago, Boston, and San Francisco, not to mention Kocherlakota.
But Yellen can’t take support for granted. Philadelphia’s Plosser dissented from the July 30 statement on the grounds that the language about how long interest rates will be kept low “does not reflect the considerable economic progress that has been made toward the Committee’s goals.” Minutes released on Aug. 20 revealed some sympathy for that view among other FOMC members. Besides Plosser, the hawks include the Fed presidents in Richmond, St. Louis, and Dallas. (Not all regional presidents vote in any given year, though all participate in FOMC deliberations.) Hawks focus on the sharp increase in the number of unfilled jobs, asking how much slack there could truly be in the labor market if there were 4.7 million openings for workers at the end of June. That’s up from a low of 2.1 million in July 2009. They are concerned that many people who dropped out of the labor market are never coming back—because they retired early or went on disability, or their skills atrophied. Declining unemployment could soon switch from a good thing to a bad thing, they suggest. In a recent speech, Dallas Fed President Richard Fisher said, “The economy is reaching our desired destination faster than we imagined.”
To Yellen’s credit, an inflationary spike in wages is nowhere in sight. Given current inflation and productivity growth, workers should see wage gains above 3 percent, says Ethan Harris, co-head of global economics research at Bank of America Merrill Lynch. Wage growth has been closer to 2 percent, no higher than overall inflation. It’s possible, as the hawks worry, that wage pressure is building up unnoticed. But Yellen has said that a little bit of above-target wage growth is OK as long as the public continues to believe that inflation will remain low over the long term. For now, the slackers at the Fed are running the show.