Hospital Stocks Surge After Justice Kennedy Criticizes Obamacare Challenge

Updated on
Supreme Court Considering Fate of Obamacare

Tenet Healthcare Corp. and HCA Holdings Inc. led a rally among hospital companies as a Supreme Court challenge to Obamacare’s insurance subsidies drew questions from a pivotal justice.

Anthony Kennedy, who is often a swing vote in important cases, said Wednesday there is a “powerful” point to the Obama administration’s argument that the health-care law would fall apart if the subsidies were ruled unlawful.

“There is a serious constitutional problem,” Kennedy said, if the court rules for the challengers’ attack on tax credits designed to help people afford insurance.

Hospitals rose more than all other stocks on the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index on Wednesday, as of 11:28 a.m. in New York. Tenet was up 7.4 percent to $50.52, and HCA rose 7 percent to $75.71. Community Health Systems Inc. advanced 6.3 percent to $52.70.

U.S. hospital companies and health insurers face the highest corporate stakes in the Supreme Court arguments, after benefiting from the law’s initial implementation. Since the law’s 2010 signing, health insurers like Anthem Inc. and UnitedHealth Group Inc. are trading near all-time highs, and the hospital companies have also rallied.

The Affordable Care Act will hand out $22 billion in credits to help people buy insurance this year, according to the Congressional Budget Office. So far, 11.4 million Americans have signed up for 2015 coverage, giving insurers and hospitals more paying customers and cutting the number who show up in the emergency room to get care without paying.

A ruling against the law would raise insurance premiums for 7.5 million Americans, according to an estimate by Avalere Health, a consulting firm. Many would drop their insurance plans, and when they got sick, they’d still go to the hospital.

‘Charity Care’

“You’re going back to charity care,” said Ana Gupte, a hospital and health insurance analyst at Leerink Partners.

Without insurance subsidies, Gupte estimates adjusted earnings growth across a group of hospitals would slow in 2016, to 4 percent from 7 percent.

The case, King v. Burwell, challenges federal subsidies in states that didn’t create their own health insurance marketplaces. The justices may not issue a decision until late June.

Publicly traded hospitals are concentrated in states such as Florida and Texas that use U.S.-run exchanges at the center of the case. HCA, the biggest for-profit U.S. hospital chain, generated 46 percent of its revenue in those two states last year, according to company filings. Tenet has about a quarter of its hospital beds in Texas and 17 percent in Florida.

Hedge Funds

Hedge funds have cut their exposure to hospital companies ahead of the ruling, according to a report by Bloomberg Intelligence. During the fourth quarter, funds cut stakes in Community Health by 4.9 percentage points and in LifePoint Hospitals Inc. by 3.6 percentage points.

“As we have said before, we are in favor of actions that improve access to care and provide more people quality health insurance,” Ed Fishbough, an HCA spokesman, said by e-mail. Donn Walker, a spokesman for Tenet, declined to comment, and Community Health didn’t respond to a request for comment.

Health insurers’ stocks have performed better than the hospitals and some are near all-time highs. Cigna Corp. has rallied 20 percent and Aetna Inc. has gained 18 percent since the court took the case through Tuesday

Gupte says insurers are less vulnerable than hospitals, in part because they’re less reliant on customers who purchase the subsidized coverage. Humana Inc. will get about 2 percent of its 2015 earnings from customers on federal exchanges, and most other large insurers will get 1 percent or less.

Industry Position

The industry has still fought a ruling against the law. Clare Krusing, a spokeswoman for trade group America’s Health Insurance Plans, said loss of the subsidies would create instability. In a brief submitted to the court, the group said losing subsidies would create a “death spiral” where insurers raise premiums and all but the sickest stop buying coverage.

A group of Republican senators has proposed providing subsidies for a transitional period, which could limit the initial impact on hospitals, according to Brian Wright, an analyst at Sterne, Agee & Leach. States could also find fixes.

The Obama administration has said there’s no backup plan if the court knocks down the subsidies.

“Hospitals will incur significant financial harm if subsidies suddenly disappear,” according to a court brief on the case from hospital groups. A decline in insured patients “could imperil some hospitals, and will make it more difficult for others to carry out their missions.”

The case before the Supreme Court is King v. Burwell, 14-114.

Before it's here, it's on the Bloomberg Terminal. LEARN MORE