Takeda Found Not Liable in Latest Diabetes Drug Lawsuit

Takeda Pharmaceutical Co. (4502), Asia’s largest drugmaker, was found not liable for the bladder cancer of two women who used its Actos diabetes medication in the company’s latest win as it faces thousands more U.S. lawsuits.

A jury in state court in Las Vegas yesterday agreed with the company that Actos didn’t cause the women’s disease, handing Takeda its fifth victory out of six cases that have gone to trial over the drug’s alleged link to bladder cancer.

“We’re very pleased we prevailed,” Takeda’s general counsel, Kenneth Greisman, said in a phone interview. “We remain confident Actos is an important treatment for patients.”

Takeda shares rose as much as 2.9 percent to 4,650 yen in Tokyo trading today, headed for the biggest gain since October, before trading at 4,649 yen at 10:05 a.m. local time.

A federal jury in Louisiana last month ordered Takeda and partner Eli Lilly & Co. (LLY) to pay more than $9 billion in damages to a former shopkeeper who developed bladder cancer after taking the drug. Takeda’s shares fell more than 5 percent in the wake of that award, which is likely to be reduced.

The Osaka, Japan-based company, which said it will appeal the Louisiana verdict, has prevailed in the four other cases that went to trial. This month, a jury in Illinois found it wasn’t responsible for the death of a man who took the drug.

Photographer: Bernd Settnike/dpa/AP Images

Drugs are packed at Takeda's pharmaceutical unit in Oranienburg, German. Craig Thompson, Takeda’s lawyer, said the plaintiffs failed to prove Actos was the cause of Cipriano’s and Triana’s bladder cancer. Close

Drugs are packed at Takeda's pharmaceutical unit in Oranienburg, German. Craig... Read More

Close
Open
Photographer: Bernd Settnike/dpa/AP Images

Drugs are packed at Takeda's pharmaceutical unit in Oranienburg, German. Craig Thompson, Takeda’s lawyer, said the plaintiffs failed to prove Actos was the cause of Cipriano’s and Triana’s bladder cancer.

Takeda faces claims by more than 7,000 plaintiffs, according to Greisman.

A 2011 analysis by the Food and Drug Administration of a company-sponsored study found some Actos users were more likely to develop bladder cancer or heart problems. Takeda officials failed to adequately warn consumers and doctors of the risks, Robert Eglet, a lawyer for the Nevada plaintiffs, Delores Cipriano and Bertha Triana, told jurors in his closing argument.

Cancer Cause

Craig Thompson, Takeda’s lawyer, said the plaintiffs failed to prove Actos was the cause of Cipriano’s and Triana’s bladder cancer. Neither woman was using the drug at the time she was diagnosed, he said.

Will Kemp, another lawyer for the Nevada plaintiffs, declined to immediately comment on the verdict.

Actos sales peaked in the year ended March 2011 at $4.5 billion and accounted for 27 percent of Takeda’s revenue at the time, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. Actos has generated more than $16 billion in sales since its 1999 release, according to court filings. Takeda now faces generic competition from Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd. (RBXY)

Last year, state juries in California and Maryland ordered Takeda to pay a total of $8.2 million in damages to former Actos users. Judges in both states threw out the verdicts.

In December, jurors in Las Vegas rejected claims the company failed to properly warn consumers about the risks of Actos.

The case is Triana v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals America Inc., A-13-680556-C, Nevada District Court, Clark County (Las Vegas).

To contact the reporter on this story: Edvard Pettersson in state court in Las Vegas at epettersson@bloomberg.net

To contact the editors responsible for this story: Michael Hytha at mhytha@bloomberg.net Andrew Dunn

Press spacebar to pause and continue. Press esc to stop.

Bloomberg reserves the right to remove comments but is under no obligation to do so, or to explain individual moderation decisions.

Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.