IMF Sees Market Volatility Risk in Fed’s Exit From Record Easing
That would have “adverse global implications,” the fund’s board of directors said today in a statement, part of an annual review of the world’s largest economy. “Effective communication on the exit strategy and a careful calibration of its timing will be critical for reducing these risks,” the Washington-based fund said.
The IMF left its U.S. growth forecast for this year unchanged at 1.7 percent, saying the housing and labor markets are improving even as the Fed’s decision looms and fiscal policy remains a drag on growth. The fund projected 2014 growth of 2.7 percent, also unchanged from a report earlier this month.
The Fed is considering reducing its $85 billion in monthly bond purchases even with unemployment at 7.6 percent and the Fed’s preferred inflation index showing prices rising 1 percent from a year earlier, below the central bank’s 2 percent goal. The Fed’s policy-making committee next meets July 30-31.
The Fed has said economic data will determine the timing and pace of any reduction in monthly bond-buying, known as quantitative easing. The central bank may start trimming purchases in September, according to a Bloomberg survey of economists.
While accommodative policy “continues to provide essential support to the recovery,” the IMF board said, “its financial stability implications should be carefully assessed” because a long period of extremely low interest rates could have unintended consequences for financial stability and complicates macro-policy in some emerging markets. The Fed has kept the main interest rate close to zero since December 2008.
The IMF also warned that “fiscal deficit reduction in 2013 is excessively rapid,” and that automatic spending cuts, called sequestration, could lower medium-term potential growth.
The board welcomed improvement in the U.S. housing and labor markets, and “agreed that the rebound of the housing market has benefited from monetary policy actions” and government-backed programs promoting refinancing and loan modification. The fund also “saw room for policies that continue to support the housing market,” the statement said.
To contact the reporter on this story: Jeanna Smialek in Washington at email@example.com
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Christopher Wellisz at firstname.lastname@example.org