Breaking News

Globalfoundries to Buy IBM's Chip Unit; IBM Sees Pretax Charge $4.7 Billion
Tweet TWEET

Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac Libor Loss Tops $3 Billion in Audit

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac may have lost more than $3 billion tied to the rigging of a key interest rate, according to internal memos by the auditor of the Federal Housing Finance Agency.

Inspector General Steve A. Linick urged FHFA Acting Director Edward J. DeMarco in a Nov. 3 memo that has not been made public to investigate the potential losses tied to manipulation of the London Interbank Offered Rate.

“We conducted a preliminary analysis of potential Libor- related losses at Fannie and Freddie and shared that with FHFA, recommending that they conduct a thorough review of the issue,” Kristine Belisle, a spokeswoman for the Inspector General, said in an e-mail. “FHFA agreed to study the matter further.”

UBS AG (UBSN), the Zurich-based bank, today agreed to pay about $1.5 billion to settle charges with U.S. and U.K. authorities for manipulating interest rates including Libor in a global conspiracy to boost profits and bonuses. Two former traders face prison for their alleged role in the conspiracy, according to a criminal complaint unsealed today.

The charges are the first brought by U.S. officials against individuals alleged to have manipulated Libor and comparable benchmarks in Europe and Japan.

Denise Dunckel, a spokeswoman for FHFA, said the regulator of Fannie Mae (FNMA) and Freddie Mac had not substantiated any Libor- related losses at either of the two mortgage-finance companies.

Washington-based Fannie Mae and McLean, Virginia-based Freddie Mac (FMCC) rely on Libor to determine interest payments on their investments in floating-rate financial instruments such as bonds and swaps.

To contact the reporter on this story: Clea Benson in Washington at cbenson20@bloomberg.net

To contact the editor responsible for this story: Maura Reynolds at mreynolds34@bloomberg.net

Press spacebar to pause and continue. Press esc to stop.

Bloomberg reserves the right to remove comments but is under no obligation to do so, or to explain individual moderation decisions.

Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.