Grand Bargain Inadequate to Fix Fiscal Woes: BGOV Study

Even a so-called grand bargain might fall short of repairing U.S. fiscal woes.

A $4 trillion combination of spending cuts and tax increases over 10 years envisioned by Democrats and Republicans as a long-term fix would be inadequate, according to a Bloomberg Government study. Almost $6 trillion in deficit reduction will be needed in the next decade “to make a minimum down payment that puts the nation on a sounder fiscal footing,” the report said.

President Barack Obama’s administration and Republicans in Congress are negotiating ways to avert the fiscal cliff, the more than $600 billion in tax increases and spending cuts that will take effect in January unless Congress acts. An agreement would be an initial step toward a long-term deficit-reduction package.

The talks reached a stalemate late last week when Republicans rejected Obama’s proposal to raise $1.6 trillion in taxes, including by raising tax rates on the top 2 percent of earners.

House Republicans yesterday countered with a $2.2 trillion deficit-cutting plan that would trim Medicare and Social Security and cap tax deductions for top earners.

The BGOV study found that it would take a $9 trillion deal, “more than double the current level being discussed -- to ensure the country’s long-run fiscal soundness as the demands of an aging population and rising health-care costs put more strains on the federal government.”

Debt Ratio

A grand bargain of $4 trillion, “a package most likely to be put in place,” would put the ratio of debt-to-gross domestic product in 2022 at 80.2 percent, above the 2012 level of about 73 percent, according to the report. To stabilize debt-to-GDP at the 2012 mark, $5.9 trillion in deficit reduction would be required.

“I would see a $4 trillion deal as knocking the current five-alarm financial fire down to a more manageable three-alarm fire with limited risk of near-term ratings downgrades, though we would still be talking about eventual U.S. insolvency,” Mike Englund, chief economist of Action Economics LLC in Boulder, Colorado, said by e-mail when asked about the study.

“If we did a $6 trillion deal, it would return us to the pre-Obama financial situation, which was hardly perfect, but was manageable and with no ratings implications,” Englund said.

Republican Proposal

The House Republican fiscal-cliff proposal, in a letter yesterday to Obama from House Speaker John Boehner and other Republican leaders, seeks $800 billion in tax revenue in the next decade and would slow the growth in Social Security cost- of-living payments. It would reduce entitlement program costs by at least $900 billion, including raising the Medicare eligibility age, and cut $300 billion in discretionary spending.

The BGOV study, dated Nov. 30, was written by Robert Litan, BGOV’s director of research; Christopher Payne, senior economic analyst; Tony Costello, lead analyst; and Patrick Driessen, senior tax analyst.

The report uses assumptions about GDP growth, inflation and interest rates from the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office.

To contact the reporter on this story: Ian Katz in Washington at

To contact the editor responsible for this story: Chris Wellisz at

Press spacebar to pause and continue. Press esc to stop.

Bloomberg reserves the right to remove comments but is under no obligation to do so, or to explain individual moderation decisions.

Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.