Breaking News

Credit Suisse Accuses Trader of Sharing Client Info With Husband
Tweet TWEET

Porsche Must Face New York Suit by Hedge Funds, Judge Rules

Porsche SE (PAH3) must face a lawsuit claiming it hid its plan to corner the market in Volkswagen AG (VOW) shares, a state judge in New York ruled, rejecting the sports- car maker’s bid to dismiss the case.

New York State Supreme Court Justice Charles Edward Ramos today said the “core” issue of the claims by 26 hedge funds including Greenlight Capital Inc. and Glenhill Capital LP is whether New York courts may hold a foreign entity responsible for fraudulent misrepresentations aimed at plaintiffs in the state. Porsche, in an e-mailed statement, said it will appeal the decision.

The court “rejects Porsche’s characterization of the issues in this action as the manipulation of the German stock market and the trade of German securities,” Ramos wrote in his opinion. “New York clearly has a vested interest in such an action.”

The funds, which bet that Volkswagen stock would fall, claim Porsche misled investors by denying through much of 2008 that it intended to acquire Volkswagen and by using manipulative trades to hide its stock positions. Porsche said on Oct. 26, 2008, that it controlled most of Volkswagen’s common stock, causing the shares to surge as short-sellers raced to cover their positions.

Photographer: Chris Ratcliffe/Bloomberg

Porsche badge is seen on the Porsche Boxter S automobile, at the Geneva International Motor Show in Geneva. Close

Porsche badge is seen on the Porsche Boxter S automobile, at the Geneva International... Read More

Close
Open
Photographer: Chris Ratcliffe/Bloomberg

Porsche badge is seen on the Porsche Boxter S automobile, at the Geneva International Motor Show in Geneva.

Under New York rules, the court “assumed the truth of the hedge funds’ allegations without ruling on the merits of their claims,” Stuttgart, Germany-based Porsche said in the statement. The company said it “continues to believe that the hedge funds’ lawsuits are without factual and legal merit.”

The case is Glenhill Capital LP v. Porsche Automobil Holding SE, 650678-2011, New York State Supreme Court (Manhattan).

To contact the reporter on this story: Joel Rosenblatt in San Francisco at jrosenblatt@bloomberg.net

To contact the editor responsible for this story: Michael Hytha at mhytha@bloomberg.net

Press spacebar to pause and continue. Press esc to stop.

Bloomberg reserves the right to remove comments but is under no obligation to do so, or to explain individual moderation decisions.

Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.