Chinese Art Buyers Renege on $22 Million, Force Clampdown

A Chinese Imperial jade seal and album of calligraphy are being re-offered for sale this week after their Asian bidders failed to pay.

The sales in France are the latest sign of auction houses clamping down on slow payments and nonpayments. Amid a growing appetite by wealthy Chinese for art, wine and other collectibles, sellers are demanding deposits by bidders on top lots and, in some cases, suing the non-payers.

Sotheby’s sales that were canceled on 19 lots between 2008 and 2011 amounted to about $22 million, according to court papers. The New York-based auctioneer started nine lawsuits in Hong Kong, naming successful bidders for the first time.

“We find it immensely effective,” said Kevin Ching, chief executive officer of Sotheby’s Asia. “It’s easy to get a default decision in Hong Kong but the cases often get settled before.” Most of the claims have now been settled, said Diana Phillips, a spokeswoman.

Olivier Doutrebente in Paris has put a valuation of as much as 1.2 million euros ($1.6 million) on a 35-sheet album of 18th- century Buddhist texts associated with the Emperor Qianlong, up for sale on March 30. The album, owned by relatives of the Sinologist Georges Soulie de Morant, was bid to 3.6 million euros by a Chinese buyer a year ago.

Qianlong Seal

Chassaing-Marambat in Toulouse, France, auctioned a Qianlong-period white stone seal, surmounted by carvings of dragons, for 12.4 million euros to another Chinese bidder in March, 2011. It will re-appear on March 31 with a revised valuation of as much as 4 million euros. Only 2.2 million euros of the original bill has been paid, said Paris Asian-art specialist Pierre Ansas, who cataloged the piece.

“It will probably make less this time,” Ansas said. “Once we’ve made the sale, we’ll be suing the non-payer for the difference.”

Ansas required clients to deposit 200,000 euros to bid last March to bid on the seal and a Qianlong-period Imperial scroll. The scroll, offered on the same day at neighboring salesroom Labarbe, was bid to a record 22.1 million euros by another Chinese client and was paid in full.

Second time around, would-be bidders on the seal must give 3 million euros, effectively a guaranteed price based on the low estimate.

Deposit Demand

“We had to ask for a big deposit because we’re looking for safe bidding,” Ansas said. “There are also a lot of smaller cases of non-payment at around 100,000 euros at the moment. That’s actually quite a lot of money for the people concerned.”

Sotheby’s (BID) introduced a requirement last April that bidders on premium lots (the definition varies) must pay a deposit of HK$1 million ($128,791) to participate.

Public records don’t necessarily show all the twists and turns of the auction business. The prices for some disputed works in Sotheby’s lawsuits are listed on Artnet.com, the widely used database, as if the transactions have been completed.

“People accept it as fact and trade on this info,” said Beverly Schreiber Jacoby, a New York-based art appraiser.

Sotheby’s filed a lawsuit seeking payment for “Self Portrait in the Yellow Mountains,” an ink scroll by 20th- century master Zhang Daqian, which fetched HK$46.6 million and was the top lot of its sale on Oct. 4, 2011. Another writ was for a 1968 abstract painting by Zao Wou-Ki which fetched $8.9 million the day before. The price is listed as the auction record for the artist on Artnet.

Disputed Lots

Sotheby’s in all disputed lots was seeking the hammer price, buyer’s premium, interest and costs. Efforts to reach the buyers for comment, through Sotheby’s, its lawyers and the China offices of Bloomberg were unsuccessful.

“The court of last resort is, literally, the courtroom,” said Victor Wiener, a New York-based art appraiser who has served as a witness in cases involving art sold at auction.

“It’s an international problem,” London-based dealer Roger Keverne said. “Some Chinese dealers are trying to sell things before they pay for them. We don’t know the full extent of it. The concern is that they can also be the under bidders. They push prices up. It isn’t a genuine market.”

The most prominent case is a Qianlong vase that was auctioned for a record 51.6 million pounds ($83 million) in London in 2010. Auctioneer Peter Bainbridge hasn’t responded to dealers’ assertions that the bill hasn’t been paid. He declined to comment when Bloomberg contacted him via e-mail yesterday.

China First

Last year, China overtook the U.S. to become the world’s largest art and antiques market, said a report published by the Netherlands-based European Fine Art Foundation earlier this month. Auctions in mainland China, Hong Kong, Macau and Taiwan raised 9.8 billion euros in 2011, said the report.

Sotheby’s spring auctions in Hong Kong, starting March 31, are estimated to bring more than $244 million and the company’s annual sales in China rose to $960 million in 2011, a rise of 40 percent from 2010.

“It’s happening to everyone,” said John Axford, head of Asian art at the U.K. auctioneers Woolley & Wallis. “I don’t know an auctioneer or a dealer who hasn’t been affected. Until we can take legal action against non-payers in China, there isn’t much we can do about this.”

(Katya Kazakina and Scott Reyburn write about the art market for Muse, the arts and culture section of Bloomberg News. Opinions expressed are their own.)

To contact the writers on the story: Scott Reyburn in London at sreyburn@hotmail.com; Katya Kazakina in New York at kkazakina@bloomberg.net.

To contact the editor responsible for this story: Manuela Hoelterhoff at mhoelterhoff@bloomberg.net.

Press spacebar to pause and continue. Press esc to stop.
Tap for Slideshow
Source: Sotheby's via Bloomberg

"10.1.68" (1968) by Zao Wou-ki. The work was among several which went unpaid by Chinese collectors, according to lawsuits filed by Sotheby’s in Hong Kong in the past two years.

Close
Source: Sotheby's via Bloomberg

"10.1.68" (1968) by Zao Wou-ki. The work was among several which went unpaid by Chinese collectors, according to lawsuits filed by Sotheby’s in Hong Kong in the past two years. Close

"10.1.68" (1968) by Zao Wou-ki. The work was among several which went unpaid by Chinese collectors, according to... Read More

Source: Doutrebente via Bloomberg

An 18th-century Chinese album of Buddhist calligraphy associated with the Emperor Qianlong. It will be re-offered by the Paris-based auctioneer Olivier Doutrebente on March 30, a year after it first appeared for sale in the French capital. The successful bidder in March 2011 failed to pay. Close

An 18th-century Chinese album of Buddhist calligraphy associated with the Emperor Qianlong. It will be re-offered by... Read More

Source: Sotheby's via Bloomberg

``Self Portrait in the Yellow Mountains'' (1961) by Zhang Daqian is auctioned at Sotheby's in 2011. The ink-and-water work fetched HK$46.6 million, nearly four times its high estimate of HK$12 million, becoming the top lot of Sotheby's Oct. 4 sale in Hong Kong. It was not paid for, Sotheby's alleged in a complaint. Close

``Self Portrait in the Yellow Mountains'' (1961) by Zhang Daqian is auctioned at Sotheby's in 2011. The ink-and-water... Read More

Source: Chaissaing-Marambat via Bloomberg

A Chinese 18th-century white jade seal that belonged to the Qianlong emperor was bid to $12.4 million euros in 2011. It was estimated to fetch between 1 million euros and 1.5 million euros at an auction at Chassaing-Marambat, Toulouse. It is being offered again at auction in 2012. Close

A Chinese 18th-century white jade seal that belonged to the Qianlong emperor was bid to $12.4 million euros in 2011.... Read More

Source: Chaissaing-Marambat via Bloomberg

A Chinese 18th-century white jade seal was estimated to fetch between 1 million euros and 1.5 million euros at an auction. It sold for 12.4 million euros in March 2011, and by December only 2.2 million had been received, according to the dealer handling the sale. Close

A Chinese 18th-century white jade seal was estimated to fetch between 1 million euros and 1.5 million euros at an... Read More

Bloomberg reserves the right to remove comments but is under no obligation to do so, or to explain individual moderation decisions.

Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.