California Rating Outlook Boosted by S&P as State Prepares $2 Billion Sale

California (STOCA1)’s credit, saddled with a negative outlook as recently as eight months ago, has been raised to positive and is poised for a higher rating, Standard & Poor’s said.

The second revision since July comes as the most-populous state prepares to sell $2 billion in general-obligation bonds. California’s A- rating, S&P’s fourth-lowest investment grade and the lowest of any state, was affirmed on $73.4 billion of general-obligation debt.

California is positioned for a higher grade if revenue comes closer to projections in Governor Jerry Brown’s budget, S&P said. Brown is promoting a November ballot measure that would raise income taxes on people who earn more than $250,000, and increase sales taxes statewide to avoid further cuts to education.

“Barring any other credit deterioration, we think the state is poised for credit improvement -- and potentially a higher rating -- pending its ability to better align its cash performance and budget assumptions,” said Gabriel Petek, an S&P analyst, in a statement. “By downsizing its spending base, the state has corrected a significant portion of its budget imbalance.”

California will offer about $2 billion of general- obligation bonds to refund debt March 1, the largest sale by the state since October. The most indebted state will also sell as much as $1 billion of cash-flow notes Feb. 22.

Lowest Rating

In January 2010, California’s credit rating was cut one level, with a negative outlook, after a budget stalemate in August forced the state to issue $2.6 billion of IOUs to pay some bills. In July 2011, S&P boosted the outlook to stable, saying passage of Brown’s budget mitigated the potential for a cash shortage. The state’s rating remains S&P’s fourth-lowest investment grade and the lowest of any state. Moody’s Investors Service gives it an A1, the second-lowest after Illinois.

“The fact that California’s ratings outlook has shifted from negative to positive in less than a year is a powerful vote of confidence in our state,” Brown said in a statement.

While the state isn’t at risk of default, S&P’s action ignores concerns about California’s liquidity, said Richard Larkin, director of credit analysis at Herbert J. Sims & Co. in Iselin, New Jersey.

Brown’s budget for the fiscal year starting July 1 assumes voters will pass tax increases in November, without which the state would cut $4.8 billion from public schools, the equivalent of taking three weeks from the academic year.

“S&P’s rating action is either vastly forward-looking or oblivious to real-time cash-flow problems,” Larkin said by e- mail.

Below Projections

California collected $528 million less in taxes in January than Brown estimated in his latest budget, Controller John Chiang said Feb. 10. Most of the shortfall was in income taxes, down $525 million, or 6.3 percent less than projected Chiang said. Corporate taxes were down $127.9 million, while sales taxes were up $42.8 million.

California’s fiscal situation doesn’t “warrant consideration of an upgrade until their budget is truly stabilized,” Larkin said. “I am at a loss as to what prompted today’s decision.”

The state’s brightening outlook corresponds with the rebound in the stock market, since the state depends disproportionately on capital-gains taxes, said Michael Pietronico, who manages $670 million of municipals as chief executive officer at Miller Tabak Asset Management in New York.

Possible cash-flow disruptions shouldn’t obscure the improvement in California’s budgetary picture, he said in a telephone interview.

“Investors tend to anticipate the state to have short-term cash-flow needs,” Pietronico said. “Most large states and municipalities do at some point, and it seems to have been well- budgeted and forecast so no one was surprised.”

Yield Down

California 10-year general-obligation bonds yielded 85 basis points more than AAA municipal debt yesterday, compared with a peak yield spread in the past year of 1.47 percentage points in June, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. A basis point is 0.01 percentage point.

State and local debt of California returned a total of 14.8 percent last year, according to a Bank of America Merrill Lynch index. That’s more than the 11.2 percent for the full $3.7 trillion municipal market, the 9.8 percent for U.S. Treasuries and the 7.5 percent for investment-grade company debt.

“Whenever ratings agencies take positive action, ultimately it should accrue to the benefits of taxpayers by constraining borrowing costs,” said Tom Dresslar, a spokesman for state Treasurer Bill Lockyer, in a telephone interview.

To contact the reporters on this story: James Nash in Sacramento at; Michael B. Marois in Sacramento at

To contact the editor responsible for this story: Mark Tannenbaum at

Press spacebar to pause and continue. Press esc to stop.

Bloomberg reserves the right to remove comments but is under no obligation to do so, or to explain individual moderation decisions.

Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.