Toyota Plaintiffs Challenge NASA Sudden-Acceleration Report
Lawyers representing hundreds of people suing Toyota Motor Corp. (7203) over incidents of sudden acceleration challenged a NASA report that found electronic flaws weren’t the cause of problems that resulted in the recall of thousands of vehicles.
Plaintiffs’ experts will contradict the findings in the NASA report, conducted for the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, and will prove Toyota’s electronic throttle control system is the cause of sudden acceleration, lawyers said in court papers filed last week in Santa Ana, California, Federal Court.
Toyota, based in Toyota City, Japan, urged U.S. District Judge James V. Selna to take judicial notice of the findings. The NASA conclusions could then be used by Toyota as factually true during trials that are scheduled to begin in 2013.
“Toyota asks this court to take judicial notice of findings and conclusions by NASA and NHTSA that are hotly disputed in this litigation,” Steve Berman, the plaintiffs’ lawyer, wrote. “If this court took judicial notice of the disputed findings and conclusions, plaintiffs would be barred from challenging them in this litigation.”
NASA concluded in the Feb, 8 report that incidents of unintended sudden acceleration in Toyota vehicles were rooted in mechanical flaws such as sticking accelerator pedals and floor mats that jammed the pedals or were caused by driver error.
The findings were cited in Toyota’s court filings and news releases to support the automaker’s contention that its electronics systems weren’t at fault in hundreds of reported cases of sudden acceleration.
The NASA study wasn’t expansive enough because engineers reviewed 280,000 lines of computer code from a total of 8 million in the automaker’s electronic systems, the plaintiffs said.
The plaintiffs also cited crystalline structures that emanate from tinned surfaces, known as “tin whiskers,” as a new cause of the unintended acceleration.
The microscopic particles “can create catastrophic problems in electronic components,” the plaintiffs said. “Tin whiskers were implicated in the complete failure of three in-orbit commercial satellites,”
The cases are combined as In re Toyota Motor Corp. Unintended Acceleration Marketing, Sales Practices and Products Liability Litigation, 8:10-ml-02151, U.S. District Court, Central District of California (Santa Ana).
To contact the reporter on this story: Bill Callahan in San Diego at email@example.com
To contact the editor responsible for this story: David E. Rovella at firstname.lastname@example.org