Breaking News

Tweet TWEET

BP Investor Suit to Be Led by New York, Ohio Funds

The New York and Ohio state pension funds will be the lead plaintiffs in shareholder litigation against BP Plc and company directors and managers over investment losses suffered in the wake of the Gulf oil spill.

U.S. District Judge Keith P. Ellison in Houston named New York State Comptroller Thomas DiNapoli and Ohio State Attorney General Richard Cordray, who head their states’ public employee pension funds, as lead plaintiffs for investors who bought either BP common stock or American depositary receipts from June 2005 to June 2010.

Ellison also named four individual investors as lead plaintiffs for a smaller class of investors who bought common shares of London-based BP or ADRs from March 2009 to April 20 of this year, the date the Deepwater Horizon rig exploded, sparking the worst offshore oil spill in U.S. history.

While the sub-class of investors claim that BP’s leadership made misleading statements about drilling safety in the Gulf of Mexico in the months before the rig explosion, the state pension funds “argue more generally that BP made fraudulent statements between 2005 and 2010 about its safety precautions in the Gulf of Mexico and elsewhere,” Ellison said in yesterday’s order.

April 20 Explosion

The New York and Ohio funds also claim substantial losses from BP ADRs purchased several weeks after the Deepwater Horizon explosion, a timeframe not covered by the complaint of the smaller group of investors, Ellison said. For six weeks after the blast, the funds claim “BP intentionally understated the oil flow rate in an attempt” to diminish harm to the company, lawyers for one of the institutional funds said in court papers.

“BP does not comment on pending litigation,” Tom Mueller, a company spokesman, said in an e-mail.

BP fell about 40 percent in the weeks after the Deepwater Horizon drilling rig exploded while drilling a BP well off the Louisiana coast on April 20, investors said in an Oct. 13 court filing. The drop eliminated billions of dollars in the company’s total market capitalization, shareholders’ lawyers claimed.

BP ADRs, each of which equals 6 ordinary shares, fell 36 cents to $43.75 at 11:26 a.m. in New York Stock Exchange trading. The ADRs are up from a low of $27.02 on June 25.

Ellison named Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll PLLC of New York, Berman DeValerio of Boston, and Yetter Coleman LLP of Houston as co-lead counsel for the larger investor securities fraud class.

The judge named Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy of Burlingame, California, and the Mithoff Law Firm of Houston as co-lead counsel for the smaller sub-class of investors who bought shortly before the spill.

‘Securities Fraud’

“Ohio public employees and retirees are among the thousands of investors harmed by the alleged misconduct of BP,” Ohio Attorney General Cordray said in a statement today. “As lead plaintiff, we will vigorously represent all shareholders, and will seek compensation for the losses suffered as a result of what we believe was securities fraud.”

The Ohio and New York funds lost more than $200 million from their transactions in BP common stock and American depositary shares during the proposed class period, beginning on June 30, 2005, and ending on June 1, 2010, according to the statement. Cordray, who was defeated in November, will be replaced by Mike DeWine, who takes office in January.

Three Categories

Securities fraud actions by BP shareholders are one of three categories of BP investor claims that have been consolidated for joint pretrial handling in Ellison’s court.

Ellison also presides over lawsuits filed by BP employees claiming losses from mismanagement of their company pension funds, as well as lawsuits brought by investors who are suing BP’s board and management on behalf of the company.

Shareholders in all three categories filed suits in multiple states before the federal panel on multidistrict litigation transferred the cases to Ellison in August. So-called MDL proceedings are designed to save time and money, and to prevent conflicting rulings by different judges presiding over similar cases.

The case is In re BP Plc Securities Litigation, 4:10- md-2185, U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas (Houston).

To contact the reporters on this story: Laurel Brubaker Calkins in Houston at laurel@calkins.us.com; Margaret Cronin Fisk in Southfield, Michigan, at mcfisk@bloomberg.net.

To contact the editor responsible for this story: David E. Rovella at drovella@bloomberg.net.

Press spacebar to pause and continue. Press esc to stop.

Bloomberg reserves the right to remove comments but is under no obligation to do so, or to explain individual moderation decisions.

Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.