Germany must face a lawsuit over bonds that defaulted under Adolf Hitler in the 1930s, a U.S. appeals court ruled, saying the nation isn’t immune from the claims and that American courts have jurisdiction to decide whether the bonds are enforceable.
World Holdings LLC, based in Tampa, Florida, claimed it owns a “significant number” of $208 million in bonds sold to U.S. purchasers following World War I and has been rebuffed when it sought repayment by the German government. The firm is seeking “hundreds of millions of dollars” in the suit, said Michael Elsner, an attorney for the investors.
Germany sold the bonds to finance rebuilding following the conclusion of the war, according to court papers. By the mid- 1930s, after Hitler became chancellor, Germany had stopped making payments on the bonds in the run up to World War II, according to the ruling issued yesterday by the federal appeals court in Atlanta.
“They decided from the ‘30s on that they were not going to pay this debt,” Elsner said in an interview.
Gerald Houlihan, an attorney for the German government, declined to immediately comment on the decision.
Under a 1953 treaty, the bondholder must show the bonds were held outside Germany as of Jan. 1, 1945, to ensure repayment. World Holdings claims the validation is unnecessary for those who didn’t originally accept the terms of the London Debt Agreement, also completed in 1953, which aimed to settle most of Germany’s pre-World War II debt.
Germany counters that World Holdings hasn’t contacted the country’s examiners with any request to validate the bonds. In addition, the country claims the 1953 treaty precludes the lawsuit in a U.S. court.
The three-judge panel said it may still eventually find that World Holdings’ failure to comply with the validation requirement could deem the bonds worthless.
“This is not a decision as to whether World Holdings’ bonds are, in fact, enforceable,” the court wrote. “We hold merely that the district court has the authority to decide that issue.”
Elsner declined to specify how much the firm is seeking, saying there are questions of conversions, interest, and “bad faith damages.”
“There are two sets of values for assets like this: historical, collector value to scripophilists and claim value,” said Amir Zada, director of Exotix USA Inc., which trades exotic and illiquid emerging market debt.
The value would be based upon the level of past due interest on the claim and also the increase in the price of gold, Zada said.
“At this stage there is no typical OTC (over the counter) market for these assets and therefore it is anybody’s guess as to the fair value for an asset of this type,” Zada said. “Ultimately it will be very interesting to see the outcome of such a court proceeding.”
The case is World Holdings LLC v. The Federal Republic of Germany, 09-14359, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit (Atlanta). The lower court case is 08cv20198, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida (Miami).