, Columnist
Don’t Bet Your Retirement on a Fake Track Record
Regulators should curb insurers’ use of hypothetical returns to sell investments.
A sure thing?
Photographer: Alan Crowhurst/Getty ImagesThis article is for subscribers only.
Suppose you like to play the horse races, and your bookie tells you he has developed a surefire, computer-generated formula for picking winners. It’s based on hundreds of variables such as the weather and a horse’s age, and he has “backtested” it on 20 years of track history. Now he’s offering to let you bet $50,000 using the formula’s recommendations.
Would you do it? How can you be sure that the historical success isn’t a fluke? Even worse, what if he deliberately designed his formula to look better than it is, so he can take your money at odds he knows are in his favor?
