Megan McArdle, Columnist

Rolling Stone's Rape Story Fails Victims

The very seriousness of the accusations, the very horror of rape, means that the reporter must try to get all sides of the story before it goes to print.

Something's missing.

Photographer: Norm Shafer/for the Washington Post via Getty Images

Rolling Stone's story about an alleged gang rape at the University of Virginia appears to be falling apart. The fraternity released a statement today rebutting specific aspects of the story. Friends of Jackie's on campus, including rape survivors, are now also questioning her story. Rolling Stone has issued a not-quite-retraction:

This may not be the biggest journalism pullback ever -- I'd say that the Bush national guard memos still hold the top spot, at least for a single story. But this certainly ranks high on the list. The story started off a couple of weeks ago as a blockbuster expose that forced a major institutional reaction from UVA; it now seems very possible that it will go down with the 8-year-old heroin addict and the collected works of Stephen Glass in the annals of journalistic hoaxes.