Matt Levine, Columnist

Citi Missed a Fat Finger

Also Revolut hostage selfies, backdated Damien Hirst NFTs and endless shrimp denials.

Sometimes banks get in trouble with regulators for misconduct, and the regulators fine the banks and issue an order describing the misconduct, and I read a description of the misconduct and am like “ah yes that sounds like misconduct.” Other times, I read the description and am like “hmm I guess but that’s kind of a gray area and I can understand why they thought it was allowed.” (Perhaps this is just me.) But sometimes, I read the description of the misconduct and am like “well that’s just using a computer, that’s just how computers work, anyone would mess that up, you can’t blame them for that.” Of course there the misconduct is in designing the computer system in such a way that people will inevitably mess it up.

For some reason, that sort of misconduct seems to happen a lot at Citigroup Inc. In 2021, Citi accidentally sent $900 million to some angry hedge funds because of what I called “a gothic horror story about software design.” Today the UK’s Financial Conduct Authority and Prudential Regulatory Authority fined Citi £61.6 million ($79 million) for a 2022 fat-finger stock trade that happened like this: