The Supreme Court’s CFPB Ruling Saved the Fed, Too
Even conservative Justice Thomas doesn’t want to undermine the global financial system. The same can’t be said for Justice Alito.
A come-what-may originalist
Photographer: Drew Angerer/Getty ImagesSome may have been surprised that the conservative US Supreme Court would uphold the constitutionality of the Consumer Finance Protection Bureau, a bugbear of conservatives since it was created in 2010 in the wake of the financial crisis. But the argument in the case — that the CFPB’s funding mechanism violated the appropriations clause of the Constitution — was notably weak. And striking it down would have raised the specter of an attack on the constitutionality of the Federal Reserve itself — a prospect that happily remains unthinkable to a majority of the court’s conservatives.
Conservative challengers to the CFPB have had success in the Supreme Court before. In 2020, in a case called Seila Law, the court struck down the way Congress protected the leadership of the CFPB from being fired by a hostile president. The court made new law in holding that this form independence violated the president’s executive power.
