Chris Hughes, Columnist

Don’t Give Activists Cause to Dine on Your Breakup

Sprawling companies are a turnoff for investors who have to sit through their turgid results presentations. Add poor performance and the punishment is harsh.

Photographer: Bloomberg

Lock
This article is for subscribers only.

Corporate breakups are costly, distracting and short on concrete business benefits. So why do investors and analysts keep pushing for them? Picture yourself fidgeting as a company presentation proceeds through weak results in countless countries, or twice switches gear to unpack three entirely unrelated businesses. You too would be praying for a big chunk of the company to just go away.

A breakup creeps onto the agenda when companies with assets that don’t necessarily fit together are perceived to be trading too cheaply. Investment analysts value each unit as if it was a standalone entity, add everything up and emphasize that the total is significantly higher than the firm’s stock-market capitalization. The difference must be a yawning “conglomerate discount.”