The UK’s £45 Billion Tax Cut Isn't Radical Enough
The untouched elephant in the economy is the National Health Service.
UK Prime Minister Liz Truss and Chancellor of the Exchequer Kwasi Kwarteng.
Photographer: WPA Pool/Getty Images EuropeThe market meltdown triggered by British Prime Minister Liz Truss’s radical plans to slash taxes partly reflects two broad critiques of her approach to fiscal policy: that her £45 billion ($50 billion) in tax cuts will be socially divisive (and perhaps usher in a Labour government) and that it’s economically illiterate.
The real weakness may be that she’s not being radical enough. In fact, let’s put the fish on the table: There is no way that Britain is getting radical, tax-cutting, growth-driving Conservative government without opening up a big, smelly discussion about the National Health Service. Health and social care account for about 20% of government spending; excluding pensions and benefits, the figure is more like 40%. Truss can’t be a radical liberalizer without addressing this line item.
