Lanhee J Chen, Columnist

Affirmative Action Defenders Ignore These Facts

Critics of the recent Supreme Court decision say it will mean fewer minorities on campus. The evidence from California says otherwise.
The racial makeup of California's colleges is changing. Photographer: Chip Chipman/Bloomberg
Lock
This article is for subscribers only.

Critics of the recent Supreme Court decision upholding the ban on affirmative action in admissions to the University of Michigan argue that it will hurt underrepresented minorities and result in a less diverse student body. The evidence from California says that argument is wrong.

The court's decision in Schuette v. Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action, and an effort last month in California to reinstate the consideration of race in admissions to its public universities, has again brought the issue into the national spotlight. Advocates of affirmative action have emphasized the oft-repeated mantra that when racial preferences aren't used in admissions, underrepresented minorities (Latinos and blacks in particular) have a tougher time getting into, enrolling in, and succeeding at competitive institutions of higher learning.