Lawmakers Look to Spruce Up Gig Work Rather Than Replace It

  • Connecticut proposal backed by AFL-CIO and Uber-funded guild
  • State talks shadowed by federal threats to contractor model
Photographer: Allison Zaucha/Bloomberg
Lock
This article is for subscribers only.

Last week in Washington, the Democratic-controlled U.S. House passed a sweeping labor lawBloomberg Terminal overhaul that would make it much easier for gig workers to prove they’re actually employees with full-fledged union rights, rather than contractors as their bosses claim. Two days later in Democratic-ruled Connecticut, state lawmakers met by video conference to consider a less adversarial approach: Creating a special industrywide version of bargaining for gig workers, without making them employees.

“It is clear that these platform apps are here to stay,” state Senator Julie Kushner, a former United Auto Workers regional director who now co-chairs the Connecticut legislature’s Labor and Public Employees Committee, said in an interview. “What’s really important is that we look at, how do we adjust so that we are getting the benefit of the platform, and the approach to work, but also making sure that we are not ignoring workers’ rights in the equation?”