Supreme Court Gets Census-Case Twist With Evidence of Racial Goals
- Foes of citizenship query trumpet new indications of motive
- GOP redistricting expert sought to boost white vote, they say
A demonstrator holds an "Every Person Counts" sign outside the U.S. Supreme Court in Washington on April 23, 2019.
Photographer: Andrew Harrer/BloombergThis article is for subscribers only.
The Supreme Court was dealt a curveball in its review of Trump administration plans to add a citizenship question to the 2020 census as new evidence surfaced about the government’s motive.
The evidence shows that a Republican redistricting consultant “played a significant role” in the decision to add the query to the decennial survey for the first time since 1950, according to a letter sent Thursday to U.S. District Judge Jesse Furman in Manhattan by the New York Immigrant Coalition. The group is leading an array of parties suing to bar the question.