Supreme Court Justices Signal Divide on Vulgar-Trademark Rights
- Court considers free-speech challenge to federal restrictions
- Gorsuch, Ginsburg question constitutionality of statute
This article is for subscribers only.
U.S. Supreme Court justices seemed divided as they considered a law that bars the federal government from granting legal protections to trademarks that officials find to be lewd or vulgar.
Hearing arguments Monday in a case centering on a clothing line known as "FUCT," the justices considered striking down a century-old provision that bars the inclusion of “scandalous” and “immoral” trademarks on a federal government registry. The case is a follow-up to a unanimous 2017 ruling that threw out a similar ban on disparaging trademarks.