Tinder Gets Rejected: Seven Judges Won’t Hear Its Ageism Defense
Judges Won't Hear Tinder's Ageism Defense
This article is for subscribers only.
A panel of seven mostly middle-aged Californians blew off Tinder’s plea for another chance to explain why discounting its dating app for users under 30 isn’t illegal discrimination against older people.
The California Supreme Court voted Wednesday, without comment, to let stand a lower court’s January ruling that the Match Group Inc. unit’s age-based discount for its premium service violates the state’s civil rights law.