Banker Pay Will Probably Fall When Robots Take Over: NordeaBy and
Nordea CEO says we’ll need to monitor what value humans add
Biggest Nordic bank is cutting 6,000 jobs to go digital
The chief executive officer of Nordea Bank AB says his industry needs to rethink pretty much everything it’s doing to brace for the future. And that includes how much it’s paying bankers.
The Nordic region’s biggest financial conglomerate is already in the process of cutting 6,000 jobs as part of a shift toward relying more on technology and less on humans. But CEO Casper von Koskull says the search for more efficient ways of doing business won’t end once those jobs are gone.
“People said automation is only in personal banking,” von Koskull said in an interview in Stockholm. “But there are elements of it in investment banking, corporate banking, liquidity management, foreign exchange. You need to look at how much of it is automated and whether there’s less human involvement.”
There will always be a “human element,” he says. But ultimately, “you need to ask the question, what value is the human adding, and how does that affect pay?”
Von Koskull’s mission is to blaze a trail that other banks will be inspired to follow. In explaining his world view, he uses phrases like “you don’t need banks, but you need banking.” He also insists that “bankers need to be more tech savvy, and understand how you use tools.”
The Nordea CEO envisions a flatter organization. So when it comes to the bank’s planned job cuts, that means “the ones who are mostly hit are middle to higher-level management, because those layers aren’t needed, or shouldn’t be,” von Koskull said.
None of this should make a career as a banker less appealing, according to von Koskull.
“If you’re passionate about the customer and about providing value to customers, and frankly also to society, I think it’s a fantastic place, still, to work,” he said.
Investment banking, in particular, is a special case, according to the Nordea CEO. “Because at the end of the day, it’s not just about the facts,” he said. “I’ve always said finance is a social science anyway, it’s not an exact science. So if you’re a merger adviser or a wealth adviser, it’s about trust and relevance.” But even here, “technology will have an impact.”
And banks are “also a place where a lot of society would say that we are still, even, paid too much,” von Koskull said.
The question of banker pay is one that regularly triggers acrimony from some corners of society. Just last month, the CEO of UBS Group AG, Sergio Ermotti, and a former deputy governor of the Bank of England, Paul Tucker, were at opposite ends of a heated debate questioning the remuneration culture in the finance industry. At the same time, there’s a growing list of banks who are ditching humans as they rely more on automation.
Von Koskull says that banks who don’t follow Nordea’s lead are ignoring “cost drift.” He expects his firm to soon be “probably the only large European bank that has completely transformed its core bank system to a modern system. It’s a completely different bank at that cost level.”
Ultimately, all of this benefits the shareholders, he said.
“Over the years, while we transform, we have a very clear aim to have a progressive dividend policy, which means it will grow every year in absolute terms.”
The spread of automation is also raising questions for some of Scandinavia’s biggest investors. ATP, Denmark’s largest pension fund which oversees $120 billion, says there’s potential to do more in the field of asset management.
“It’s perfectly conceivable that this will play a much bigger role in investing and that’s also something we can envisage, based on futures and ETFs,” Chief Investment Officer Kasper Ahrndt Lorenzen said in an interview. “It’s a natural question for us to be asking ourselves.”
— With assistance by Niklas Magnusson