Cars Made in U.K. May Struggle to Be British Enough Post-BrexitBy and
’Rules of origin’ create challenge for automakers and U.K.
Risk of rising production costs from Brexit if not fixed
Manufacturers of “Made in the U.K.” cars are facing a worrying dilemma: Their vehicles might not be British enough to escape expensive tariffs after Brexit.
Current trade pacts generally require exporters to prove that 50 to 60 percent of a product’s components are from the originating country to avoid tariffs. But U.K. cars are now just 44 percent British-made on average, according to the Automotive Council.
Such numbers mean auto companies are already bracing themselves for the U.K. to strike post-Brexit trade deals that will most likely require them to source more vehicle parts from within Britain. The demands also show how non-tariff barriers may prove a bigger headache for firms than duties.
“If we have a free-trade agreement with the EU after Brexit, then we’ll have to have rules for determining whether the cars coming out of the U.K. really are considered British cars,” said Peter Holmes, an economist at the U.K. Trade Policy Observatory.
So-called rules of origin are designed to stop parties to a free-trade agreement being used by other counties to gain preferential market access. If Britain leaves the customs union, as planned, U.K. goods may not be eligible for reduced tariffs that are negotiated in new deals if they contain insufficient “originating” content.
Complying with the rules risks pushing up the cost of production for manufacturers and burdening them with paperwork. A report by the opposition Liberal Democrats last year cited research that trade costs stemming from such demands could increase by between 4 percent and 15 percent for all sectors.
Even as they hope the U.K. will end up winning advantageous trade deals, firms are preparing for the worst. Honda Motor Co., which produces its Civic marque in the British town of Swindon, is already researching suppliers across the U.K. and Europe, a spokesman said.
The U.K. automotive sector would need “significant divergence from current practice” to actually benefit from any free-trade deals with the EU or other countries, Ian Howells, senior vice president at Honda Motor Europe, said in June.
The importance of foreign parts was laid bare in a report last week from the Institute for Government. It estimated that for every pound the U.K. car industry spends abroad, 44 pence is spent importing parts from overseas. It also declared the sector the most reliant of all U.K. industries on European Union input.
It’s not just carmakers that are affected. A March study by lawmakers in the House of Lords drew warnings from the pharmaceutical, food and defense sectors that they could also be hampered by "rules of origin" after Brexit. A 2011 study by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development estimated the U.K. used some $69 billion of inputs from the EU in producing goods that were subsequently exported.
One solution could be if U.K. carmakers are allowed to count parts made in Europe and vice-versa, as is now the case, said Mike Hawes, chief executive of the Society of Motor Manufacturers and Traders. That might require British negotiators to give European companies easy access to the British products they rely on in the hope of securing concessions for the automotive sector.
The EU side may not be willing to sign up to such an accord. France, for example, could seize the opportunity to induce Nissan -- which is 43.4 percent owned by Renault SA, which in turn is 15 percent owned by the French state -- to try to move its Sunderland manufacturing operations across the English Channel, said Holmes.
“Ultimately, the French government would quite like to see the production that goes on in Sunderland replaced by production somewhere in France,” he said. “So the French government might have a long-term interest in making these rules of origin slightly stricter.”
Nissan declined to comment.
Sigrid de Vries, secretary general of European auto supplier association CLEPA, said that carmakers are “considering various options” and “due to the rules of origin in EU trade deals with third countries,” they “might consider switching their sourcing” of components to elsewhere in the region rather than the U.K.
“Changes will be complex and painful,” she said. “The automotive industry is a prime example of how the EU internal market has helped underpin competitiveness in the face of global competition: The sector operates on the global market place.”
Even if carmakers are ultimately able to source enough British parts, the bureaucracy of simply proving their provenance will likely increase costs, according to the SMMT. This could erode the competitive edge of finely tuned, “hour-by-hour” manufacturing processes, which see trucks full of parts roll into the port of Dover from mainland Europe and straight to factory doors.
Trucks entering Dover from outside the EU are currently subject to clearance that can take anywhere from five minutes to two hours, even if they have the right paperwork, according to Chris Howard, a freight services controller at Motis, which handles logistics at the port.
In Jaguar Land Rover’s Solihull factory in the English Midlands, millions of components are delivered every day with thousands of truck movements, a Jaguar Land Rover spokesman said. Anything that slows down the process is going to be a challenge for any manufacturing business, he said.
The U.K. government has given assurances to Nissan and Toyota, two of the country’s biggest carmakers, that they will remain competitive after Brexit.
“I don’t see how they can do that,” said Holmes of the U.K. Trade Policy Observatory. “If you don’t have a customs union, it’s very difficult to replicate the single market just for one industry.”