Fracking Opponents Find Lawyers Beat Superglue in Slowing ShaleNidaa Bakhsh
Campaigners desperate to prevent the birth of a U.K. shale-gas industry have glued themselves to walls, barricaded country lanes and climbed drill rigs. Yet their most potent weapon is more prosaic: lawyers.
Anti-shale groups including Friends of the Earth and Greenpeace are using environmental and property law to challenge drilling at every turn, and it’s working. Production is now likely to start in 2018, two years later than envisaged, partly because getting permission to explore has been so slow, said John Williams, senior principal at energy consultants Poyry Plc.
The delay is frustrating Prime Minister David Cameron’s plans to expand economic growth and cut energy prices by developing shale. For the protesters, no good can come from hydraulic fracturing, the process that uses a mix of pressurized water and chemicals to prise fuel out of shale rock. They say it pollutes water and contributes to greenhouse-gas emissions.
“There is a broad range of legal and commercial dynamics for the nascent U.K. shale industry to navigate,” said Jon Clark, head of oil and gas transaction services at Ernst & Young LLP. “Lobby groups are scrutinizing and applying challenges in many of these areas.”
The U.K. isn’t the only country where the law is stopping explorers trying to repeat the success of the industry in the U.S.’s shale fields. France’s highest court upheld a ban on fracking last week, while drillers face a legal battle to develop fields in South Africa. On Oct. 10, the European Parliament voted to tighten regulation on shale drilling.
Greenpeace this week started a campaign that encourages U.K. landowners to use trespass laws to block exploration. The group says drilling horizontally under people’s land -- a technique widely used in shale production -- is illegal unless the property owner gives permission.
“There’s no doubt the breadth and depth of fracking opposition across England is proving problematic for the government and the industry,” said Greenpeace energy campaigner Leila Deen. “Anti-fracking groups are very switched on, very well-networked and prepared to use a range of means to stop fracking, including legal.”
At Balcombe, a village south of London that saw anti-shale protests from July, Cuadrilla Resources Ltd. mothballed a well it spent a month drilling to resubmit a planning application because of ambiguity related to the boundaries. Protesters also demonstrated at the company’s headquarters in Lichfield, central England, in August. Others superglued themselves to the entrance of an office block housing its public-relations advisers.
In June, Cuadrilla had been made to seek a mining waste permit for its Balcombe site after Friends of the Earth wrote to the Environment Agency, a move that held up the start of drilling.
The challenges from campaign groups have made Cuadrilla cautious at its other projects. Drilling at a license in Lancashire in northwest England was delayed by almost a year to allow the company to carry out a full environmental impact assessment. This month, Cuadrilla said it would abandon the site on concern its operations would endanger migrating birds.
Because exploiting shale relies on horizontal wells that stretch thousands of meters through narrow layers of rock, drilling will typically pass under several properties and companies may require the consent of all landowners involved.
In 2008, Mohamed al-Fayed, the businessman who once owned Harrods department store, successfully sued Star Energy U.K. Ltd. under laws of trespass for drilling under his estate in Surrey, England, without seeking permission.
“It is unlawful if companies don’t obtain consent from landowners or follow the statutory process for compulsory acquisition of the rights,” said Emma Bissett, an associate in the energy and natural resources team at Squire Sanders LLP in Leeds, England. “If they continue drilling without this, they risk being sued for trespass and open themselves up to the risk that the court may grant an injunction to stop the drilling.”
Cuadrilla said the issue shouldn’t be a bar to developing shale fields in Britain.
“All of our existing subsurface underground rail, water, gas, telecommunications and electric development has historically succeeded in legal coexistence with surface property rights,” Chief Executive Officer Francis Egan said Oct. 14. “We are confident that new subsurface shale development that safely offers energy security, skilled jobs and community benefits will be no different.”
The U.K. said in June the Bowland basin that stretches from the east to the northwest of England may hold as much as 1,300 trillion cubic feet of gas. An extraction rate of 10 percent, typical at U.S. fields, would allow U.K. demand to be met for almost 50 years. The government has encouraged explorers through lower tax rates as it tries to cut reliance on imports and spur the economy amid declining reserves in the North Sea.
“Fracking has become a national debate in Britain -- and it’s one that I’m determined to win,” Cameron wrote in the Daily Telegraph in August. “If we don’t back this technology, we will miss a massive opportunity to help families with their bills and make our country more competitive.”
A government consultation paper published last month proposed limiting the number of landowners from whom it’s necessary to seek permission before drilling. Only those property holders directly affected by above-ground work would need to give consent, according to the plans.
“The government wants to make it easier for the shale-gas industry by easing planning rules and streamlining regulations,” said Tony Bosworth, a climate and energy campaigner at Friends of the Earth. “Work in these areas is an essential part of our campaign and has helped slow down the development of the industry.”
To continue reading this article you must be a Bloomberg Professional Service Subscriber.
If you believe that you may have received this message in error please let us know.