Christopher Langner is a markets columnist for Bloomberg Gadfly. He previously covered corporate finance for Bloomberg News, and has written for Reuters/IFR, Forbes, the Wall Street Journal and Mergermarket.

Everyone who covers emerging markets has heard the mantra: Yes, there's a lot of debt but, unlike the late 1990s, sovereign balance sheets are fine. Corporations are the ones to worry about, and they are hardly ever sources of systemic risk.

That may have been true five years ago. It isn't any longer, if the companies that specialize in assessing credit strength are to be believed. Fitch Ratings, Moody's Investors Service and S&P Global Ratings have taken 3.1 times as many negative actions as positive on sovereign and government-related bonds from emerging markets this year. The last time the ratio was this high was in 1998, in the middle of the Asian financial crisis.

Spiraling Down
There were 3.1 downgrades or negative outlook changes for every upgrade of an emerging market sovereign or government-related entity this year, the worst ratio since the Asian financial crisis
Source: Bloomberg
*Data include rating and outlook downgrades for both sovereigns and government-related entities in developing nations.

In absolute terms, the number of negative actions is the highest ever. That partly reflects the fact that more emerging-market government entities have international bonds and, therefore, credit ratings.

Bad Record
Fitch, Moody's and S&P took a record 1,971 negative rating actions on emerging-market sovereign and government-related entities in 2016
Source: Bloomberg
*Data include rating and outlook downgrades for both sovereigns and government-related entities in developing nations.

Credit folks often say that ratings are a lagging indicator, so perhaps the worst is already behind us. It seems that's not the case. Of the 134 sovereigns rated by Moody's, 26 percent have a negative outlook, according to a recent report -- the highest proportion since 2012. Most of those carrying the negative tag are emerging markets. That suggests a slew of downgrades is on the way.

South Africa received a reprieve on Friday as S&P Global Ratings kept its assessment unchanged, following speculation that the nation would be cut to junk. Still, the list of so-called fallen angels, which have gone from an investment grade to junk, among emerging market sovereigns has gotten long over the past two years.

Even if there are no downgrades, there will still be pain for bondholders. As recently as 2015, Brazil sported the equivalent of a BBB- score (the lowest investment grade) from all the three major companies. In the months leading up to its downgrade to junk, the average yield premium on its dollar notes more than doubled, causing big losses to international investors. 

Pain Scale
The cost of hedging against a Brazilian default, which is also a gauge of the average yield premium on the nation's dollar bonds, more than doubled in the months leading to its downgrade to junk
Source: Bloomberg; CMA

When a sovereign defaults, there's a domino effect of companies, private and state-owned, that follow. For once, S&P, Moody's and Fitch may be giving investors early indications of what to expect. The message is clear: Developing nations are no longer doing that well.

This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of Bloomberg LP and its owners.

To contact the author of this story:
Christopher Langner in Singapore at

To contact the editor responsible for this story:
Matthew Brooker at