How ETFs Became the Market

If you work in exchange-traded funds, memories of 2008 aren’t all doom and gloom.

Lehman Brothers’ collapse in September of that year ushered in a new era for ETFs. And they've been on a roll ever since. Assets in the low-cost portfolios that trade like stocks and typically track an index have swelled to $5 trillion globally, up from less than $700 billion before the financial crisis. Meanwhile, the number of funds has more than doubled as they gradually account for bigger and bigger pieces of the equity, bond and commodity markets.

Although they started trading in the U.S. in 1993, the financial crisis marked a turning point for ETFs. Banks were forced to shed large inventories to bolster their balance sheets. And retail investors who’d lost their shirts went looking for ways to diversify their risk. ETFs offered both a solution.

By packaging slices of the market into tradeable vehicles, ETFs became the go-to instrument for professionals seeking instant, liquid exposure to markets around the world. Mom-and-pop savers, meanwhile, got a cheap, transparent way to buy companies for the long haul.

But in remaking financial markets in their image, ETFs have fueled a fear that indexed investing will trigger the next crisis. Evidence for that is patchy, but the allegations—that ETFs sever securities from their fundamentals, that they encourage volatility, that they erode market efficiency to the point of Marxism—feed a debate that ETF lovers and phobics alike have to embrace.

Big Trades

Trading in ETFs usually accounts for about a quarter of the daily volume in U.S. stock markets, but that can leap to nearly 40 percent on some days. These spikes typically coincide with surprise events or policy changes, with ETFs providing a speedy way to pursue a new opportunity or protect against emerging risks.

Trading Spikes
ETF trading climbs when markets are volatile.

ETF turnover as % of total U.S. equity turnover

40

%

1

3

2

30

20

0

2010

2012

2014

2016

2018

1. August 5–10, 2011: S&P downgrades U.S. credit rating

2. August 21–27, 2015: China’s central bank devalues the yuan, roiling markets

3. February 5–6, 2018: U.S. stocks plunge the most in 6½ years

ETF turnover as % of total U.S. equity turnover

August 21–27, 2015:

China’s central bank devalues the yuan, roiling markets

August 5–10, 2011:

S&P downgrades U.S. credit rating

40

%

February 5–6, 2018:

U.S. stocks plunge the most in 6½ years

30

20

0

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

ETF turnover as % of total U.S. equity turnover

August 21–27, 2015:

China’s central bank devalues the yuan, roiling markets

August 5–10, 2011:

S&P downgrades U.S. credit rating

40

%

February 5–6, 2018:

U.S. stocks plunge the most in 6½ years

30

20

0

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

Source: Bloomberg

With the push of a button, traders at banks or the high-frequency firms that have largely taken their place driving markets can bet on news in the U.S., as well as issues affecting nations around the world. Think political crises in Brazil or economic sanctions on Turkey. ETFs proved useful when Greece’s local market shut down during the sovereign debt crisis, giving investors an outlet to trade. At times like these, ETFs step up and can absorb more volume than the local market itself.

Shorting Turkey

Turkey ETF inflows

$100M

75

50

25

0

–25

−50

−75

Jan

2018

Mar

May

Jul

Sep

BlackRock’s Turkey ETF saw its largest inflow in five years last month as investors sought to bet against the nation’s companies by creating shares to short.

Turkey ETF shares shorted

5M

4

3

2

Jan

Mar

May

Jul

Sep

Turkey ETF inflows

$100M

75

50

25

0

–25

−50

−75

Jan

2018

Mar

May

Jul

Sep

BlackRock’s Turkey ETF saw its largest inflow in five years last month as investors sought to bet against the nation’s companies by creating shares to short.

Turkey ETF shares shorted

5M

4

3

2

Jan

Mar

May

Jul

Sep

Turkey ETF inflows

Turkey ETF shares shorted

$100M

5M

BlackRock’s Turkey ETF saw its largest inflow in five years last month as investors sought to bet against the nation’s companies by creating shares to short.

75

50

4

25

0

3

–25

−50

2

−75

Jan

2018

Jan

Mar

May

Jul

Sep

Mar

May

Jul

Sep

Sources: Bloomberg and S3 Partners
Volume Surge
BlackRock’s Brazil ETF saw almost as much activity as the Ibovespa in June after a stock sell-off caused by political turmoil.
  • Ibovespa equity index turnover
  • ETF turnover

$4B

June 7, 2018

Brazil ETF turnover of $3,871,406,080

3

2

1

0

Apr

2018

May

Jun

Jul

Aug

Sep

$4B

June 7, 2018

Brazil ETF turnover of $3,871,406,080

3

2

1

0

Apr

2018

May

Jun

Jul

Aug

Sep

$4B

June 7, 2018

Brazil ETF turnover of $3,871,406,080

3

2

1

0

Apr

2018

May

Jun

Jul

Aug

Sep

Source: Bloomberg

Maturing Uses

This reach has helped lure new investors who have traditionally advocated for active management. Hedge funds, pension plans and insurers are increasingly using these funds to trade in and out of positions and as the low-cost core of their portfolios. Other institutions are using ETFs in lieu of futures or credit-default swaps, and some are even using these vehicles to more efficiently buy or sell the underlying securities.

Institutional Ownership
Institutional investors have increased their holdings of ETFs.

  • Insurance company
  • Pension fund
  • Hedge fund

ETF assets held

$125

B

100

75

50

25

0

’08

’09

’10

’11

’12

’13

’14

’15

’16

’17

ETF assets held

$125

B

100

75

50

25

0

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

ETF assets held

$125

B

100

75

50

25

0

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

Sources: Deutsche Bank Delta-1 and Quant Strategy, Factset

To satisfy these sophisticates, issuers have added new products miles removed from the humble S&P 500 Index. Want a leveraged bet on volatility? Or an inverse geared wager on the death of the mall? Anyone with a brokerage account can now play alongside the professionals. Both also have their pick of a swath of so-called smart-beta strategies tracking indexes that shun traditional market-capitalization weightings. These products promise targeted access to momentum stocks or undervalued companies.

Getting Smarter?
Equity funds using smart beta strategies take up a bigger piece of the assets pie.

13.9%

2008

20.9%

2017

13.9%

2008

20.9%

2017

13.9%

2008

20.9%

2017

Source: Bloomberg

But even as ETFs grow more sophisticated in terms of products, users and uses, ordinary investors still account for more than half of the assets. The reality is that if your grandma owns an emerging-markets ETF, she’s sitting alongside the likes of Bridgewater Associates and a Singaporean sovereign wealth fund. Issuers are committed to making sure that retail money sticks around, cutting fees on ETFs to as low as 30 cents for every $1,000 invested.

Getting Cheaper
Indexed ETF fees have come down as issuers compete for market share.

Asset-weighted average expense ratios for U.S.-listed ETFs, in basis points

30

21 bps

Equity ETFs

20

18 bps

Bond ETFs

10

0

2007

2009

2011

2013

2015

2017

Asset-weighted average expense ratios for U.S.-listed ETFs, in basis points

30

21 bps

Equity ETFs

20

18 bps

Bond ETFs

10

0

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

Asset-weighted average expense ratios for U.S.-listed ETFs, in basis points

30

21 bps

Equity ETFs

20

18 bps

Bond ETFs

10

0

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

Sources: Investment Company Institute and Morningstar

Different investment profiles and horizons arguably make funds more stable, but protecting the little guy is something U.S. regulators are thinking about as ETFs top $3.7 trillion in assets. For issuers now looking to expand globally, it’s one risk they’ll need to address to successfully spread around the world.

Mapping the Money
Of the $5.3 trillion global ETP market, assets in U.S. products make up 70 percent, while Japanese products make up 6 percent.

$3.7T

United States of America

$394.8B

United Kingdom

$309.9B

Japan

France

Germany

Israel

Canada

S. Korea

Switzerland

Hong Kong

Other countries

China

$3.7T

United States of America

Switzer-

land

China

Germany

Canada

$394.8B

United Kingdom

$309.9B

Japan

Hong

Kong

Other

countries

Israel

France

South

Korea

$394.8B

United Kingdom

$3.7T

United States of America

$309.9B

Japan

Germany

France

Canada

Israel

Switzerland

Hong

Kong

South

Korea

Australia

Other

countries

China

Taiwan

Source: Bloomberg
Note: As of September 7, 2018.