Berlin Attack Exposes Europe's Deportation Problem
The story of Anis Amri, the man sought in connection with Monday’s terror attack in Berlin, shows clearly that Europe, and Germany in particular, isn’t letting in too many migrants -- it’s kicking out too few.
Amri, with a history of violence, drug dealing and other crime, including a truck theft, left Tunisia in 2011, during the country’s Arab Spring revolution. The country’s economy had come to a standstill because of the disturbances and Europe’s financial crisis, which undermined tourism. At the same time, border controls all but disappeared, so irregular migration to Europe spiked. When Amri reached Italy, he continued his career as a petty criminal, earning a four-year prison sentence.
After his release in 2015 to a deportation center, Italian authorities waited for Tunisia to recognize his citizenship and issue a passport. The answer didn’t come in the allocated time, and Italy released Amri with orders to leave the country. He went to Germany: July 2015 was a good time to get lost among the throngs of refugees then pouring across the border. Many didn’t have valid identity papers, and Amri could start a new life by joining those filing asylum applications.
This entitled him to 392 euros ($408) a month in cash. The German migration service was flooded with applications, and waiting times were long. By the time Amri was denied refugee status in June 2016, he was under surveillance on suspicion of terrorist ties and selling soft drugs in Berlin. Amri should have been deported immediately; but Tunisia denied he was its citizen. It issued his passport only on Wednesday -- after the truck attack on a Christmas market in Berlin.
Immigrants from poor and violent countries brave enough to make the long, dangerous journey to Europe generally deserve a chance. Not all of them can make good use of it, though. Amri, with no education, no desire to learn or work and a tendency to break rules, did not belong in Europe and should have been kicked out at several points in his squalid sojourn here. But he wasn’t because the system isn’t designed to handle cases like his.
The German bureaucracy has done a stellar job of reducing the asylum application backlog, but it hasn’t demonstrated similar efficiency in deporting those deemed ineligible. It processed 616,000 applications from January through November, 160 percent more than in the same period of last year. But the 23,750 deportations in that period is an increase of just 14 percent over 2015. With another 51,243 taking advantage of voluntary repatriation programs, compared with about 35,000 last year, about 215,000 rejected asylum-seekers are still residing in Germany. And that number will jump.
Earlier this month, McKinsey submitted a report to Germany’s Federal Office for Migration and Refugees, titled “Return Management 2017,” predicting that the number of people ordered to leave but still in Germany will grow to 485,000 by the end of next year. McKinsey says immigrants stuck around for an average of 12 months after being told to leave, while the deportation process after a criminal conviction takes 20 months.
The longer Europe’s rejects overstay their welcome, the more embittered they become and the more susceptible to Islamic State recruiters’ whisperings. Amri probably wasn’t a terrorist when he arrived in Italy from Tunisia; otherwise he would have acted much earlier. His radicalization must have happened while he was in Europe, in limbo.
McKinsey advised Germany to improve cooperation between states in rounding up deportees, set up special detention centers and offer stronger financial incentives than just a ticket home to encourage voluntary repatriation -- a worthwhile investment, given that each rejected applicant costs Germany 670 euros a month, according to McKinsey.
But none of this will help unless Germany and its neighbors work out better return mechanisms with the immigrants’ countries of origin. Fixing this requires a major diplomatic effort to produce efficient repatriation procedures with the dozen or so countries responsible for the bulk of the immigrants.
European governments are humane; they cannot just put people in boats and push them off toward Turkey or North Africa, the way Spain did with 17th-century Moriscos. But that hardly justifies the management failure of being unable to deport convicted criminals and repatriate rejects.
German Chancellor Angela Merkel doesn’t need to apologize for letting people try their luck in her country. She does, however, have a responsibility to make sure that those with no respect for rules cannot stay. McKinsey is criticized in Germany for charging millions of euros for its advice -- but the expense is justifiable if it forces bureaucrats and politicians to resolve the issue.
This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
To contact the author of this story:
Leonid Bershidsky at firstname.lastname@example.org
To contact the editor responsible for this story:
Mark Gilbert at email@example.com