The last people you'd want as the first couple.

Photographer: Alex Wong/Getty Images

Melania Trump's Plagiarism Confirms Your Fears

Megan McArdle is a Bloomberg View columnist. She wrote for the Daily Beast, Newsweek, the Atlantic and the Economist and founded the blog Asymmetrical Information. She is the author of "“The Up Side of Down: Why Failing Well Is the Key to Success.”
Read More.
a | A

At first after the convention broke for the night on Monday, everyone on the cable news networks agreed that Melania Trump’s speech was good. An hour later everyone was talking about how much her apparent plagiarism from Michelle Obama's 2008 speech would hurt the Trump campaign.

This morning Trump supporters are offering the only defense they can: that these sentiments about the value of hard work are so anodyne that anyone could have uttered them, that they could have been original to both speakers because they weren't particularly original thoughts to begin with.

That defense won’t stand. The similarities are simply too strong.

Writers know that it’s unlikely to hit on someone else’s words as closely as Melania Trump's speech copied Michelle Obama's. As my friend Terry Teachout once pointed out to me, highlighting as few as seven words of your own writing, and searching them in Google surrounded by quotation marks (which restricts the search to exact matches), is likely to produce exactly one hit: your work. And I’m not talking about elaborate sentences; I’m talking about boring fragments like “And I’m not talking about elaborate sentences.” That search returned no hits when I searched it this morning, and will return exactly one after this column is published.

Whoever wrote Melania Trump’s speech pretty clearly looked at Michelle Obama’s speech, changed a few words, and presented them as Melania’s own. This is absolutely stunning incompetence. Probably.

I saw several conspiracy theories circulating last night. Perhaps Donald Trump benefited from the distraction as people focused on the speech rather than talking about the attempted rebellion over the rules that was quashed yesterday. Others suggested that this was an act of sabotage by a Republican who doesn’t want Trump to win.

In general, however, one should never credit conspiracy with something that can be adequately explained by incompetence. This is all of a piece with the way the Trump campaign has been run -- disorganized and understaffed. A team of those establishment insiders that Trump so likes to revile would probably have caught this and fixed it. Instead, his wife was humiliated in her first major speech.

For further evidence of that incompetence, note how the campaign has compounded this error by refusing to simply admit what happened and move on. Melania Trump is not running for president, and she probably didn’t write the speech. To be sure, she made the spin control more difficult by giving a television interview that suggested she had. But any marginally competent campaign would have said “A campaign staffer contributed several lines to her speech; those lines appear to have been plagiarized; and now that person is an ex-campaign-staffer.” That’s a boring story, and the media would have noted it and moved on.

Instead, the Trumps pushed the unlikely line that this was simply a surprising coincidence. Since journalists know just how unlikely that is, they are going to keep talking about it. Which costs Donald Trump a day of the convention coverage that is supposed to be giving him a badly needed boost in the polls.

This convention was supposed to be the event that established Donald Trump as someone who had what it takes to win the presidency, and to serve in that most demanding of offices. So far, it has only established him as someone who doesn’t really understand what it takes to do either job.

This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.

To contact the author of this story:
Megan McArdle at

To contact the editor responsible for this story:
Philip Gray at