Supreme Court Doesn't Need Spider-Man Reboot
The Spider-Man franchise has been rebooted many times since Stan Lee and Steve Ditko invented the superhero in 1962. But the Spider-Man tradition reached a new peak Monday when the web-spinner became the centerpiece of a U.S. Supreme Court decision about, of all things, tradition, specifically the use of precedent in the court's opinions. Justice Elena Kagan, writing for a 6-3 majority, sprinkled in clever Spider-Man references, enhancing her reputation as the funniest justice in writing. But the subject of precedent is in fact as serious as a radioactive spider bite -- and just as basic to the Supreme Court’s foundation myth as Peter Parker’s bite is to Spider-Man’s.
To continue reading this article you must be a Bloomberg Professional Service Subscriber.
If you believe that you may have received this message in error please let us know.
- Trump, Presidential? Steph Curry Knows Better.
- Melania Trump Has a Bully-in-Chief Problem
- Conservatives and the Rotten Smell of States' Rights
- London's Uber Ban Is a Big Brexit Mistake
- Trump Slams the Brakes on Self-Driving Cars
- Merkel's Lackluster Win Is Good for Germany
- Serving Ice Cream Isn't a Cultural Exchange