Republicans Keep Fighting Phony Presidential Abuse
I love Kevin Drum’s post on the latest Republican complaint about Barack Obama: that he influenced the Federal Communications Commission on net neutrality. Horrors!
Oh, wait: What they’re calling an abuse is the normal function of the presidency.
I'm trying to remember all the ordinary presidential (and congressional) actions that Republicans have tried to turn into scandals. In reverse order, here’s what I have -- and this isn’t even counting the claims that Obama’s use of the veto is unprecedented because he’s planning to veto the Keystone XL bill:
5. Presidential influence on executive-branch agencies (see above).
4. Recess appointments (once common, now basically read out of the Constitution by the Supreme Court).
2. Reconciliation (that’s on the congressional side, of course).
I’m sure I’m missing some. Anyone remember other examples?
Has Obama sometimes arguably overstepped his authority? Probably. He may have even extended it further than other presidents. I'm not really seeing any important extensions of presidential authority, but that's not really what I'm saying here anyway.
Look, we need the out party to be tough on the White House. That’s part of how the system works. But instead, Republicans have spent most of the last six years reacting to fantasies, and ignoring their obligation to do the hard work of finding real abuses. It really is a disgrace.
This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
To contact the author of this story:
Jonathan Bernstein at firstname.lastname@example.org
To contact the editor responsible for this story:
Max Berley at email@example.com