Fish, Shotguns and Judicial Activism

Funny as today's two cases may seem, they illustrate how policy and law constantly interact at the Supreme Court.
Yum, grouper.

Is a fish a tangible object? Does a sawed-off shotgun pose serious risk of injury? Laugh if you must, but the U.S. Supreme Court is taking up these questions in a pair of cases that will form another chapter in the saga of our vastly expanding federal criminal law. Funny as the cases may seem -- both funny strange and funny ha-ha -- they illustrate how policy and law constantly interact for a court deeply divided about the nature of statutory interpretation.

To continue reading this article you must be a Bloomberg Professional Service Subscriber.