World Mistakes Obama's Leadership for Childishness

Leonid Bershidsky is a Bloomberg View columnist. He was the founding editor of the Russian business daily Vedomosti and founded the opinion website
Read More.
a | A

Serious as the debt-ceiling deadlock in the U.S. may be, outside observers see it as little more than a silly temper tantrum. Foreign politicians and financial professionals are increasingly talking to, and of, Washington as if it were a room full of spoiled brats.

China's Deputy Finance Minister Zhu Guangyao sounded decidedly condescending when he remindedthe U.S. that "the clock is ticking." "We hope the United States understand the lessons of history," he lectured, noting the U.S. credit-rating downgrade by Standard & Poor's after the previous such crisis in 2011. China ownsat least $1.3 trillion of U.S. government debt, so its officials feel entitled to call on their U.S. counterparts to show some responsibility.

Germany, holding a mere $55 billion of U.S. debt, is irritated at the way the U.S. is shirking its role as the Western world's leader. The government shutdown is holding up trade talks between Washington and Brussels, and President Barack Obama had to skip an Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation meeting this week, ceding valuable ground to the leaders of China and Russia.

"The American self-blockade is shocking," the newspaper Handelsblatt quotedKarl Georg Wellmann, a foreign policy expert with Germany's Christian Democratic Union party, as saying. "It undermines their position as a Western power."

QuickTake: The Debt Ceiling

Chiding and condescension from the rest of the world isn't what the sole remaining great power needs to enhance its reputation. Few of the foreign commentators understand that Obama's stand on the debt crisis is so rigid for the same reason he was so determined to launch airstrikes against Syria: Two years ago, he promised, before witnesses, never to negotiate with Republicans on the debt ceiling again.

Bob Woodward, in his book ``The Price of Politics,'' described the cathartic moment after Obama and House Speaker John Boehner made the deal that averted a U.S. default in 2011:

"Do we have a deal?" Obama asked. Boehner said they did. "Congratulations," he said. "Congratulations to you too, John." Then Obama turned to the staffers in the room. "Let's not do this again," he said. "We're not going to negotiate on the debt limit ever again."

The humiliation of the extended negotiations, the endless bickering over relatively trivial matters such as tactical cuts to defense spending or Medicaid, the ever-present threat of default that, to some participants, made the process look like the Cuban missile crisis -- Obama has vowed never to go through any of this again. For him, standing firm and staring down his opponents is the only way to make sure the debt limit will never again be used for political bargaining.

As with Syria, Obama will only step away from the brink if a novel solution arises to break the stalemate. In the Syrian case, Russia convinced President Bashar al-Assad to agree to chemical disarmament, and Obama gratefully stepped back from ordering airstrikes. In the current crisis, too, he needs a way out.

To outsiders, this may look like stubbornness. In fact, it's an example of commitment, just the kind people expect from the leader of a superpower. Obama knows, after all, that unorthodox solutions exist: The mintingof a trillion dollar coin, or the issuanceof bonds at prices far exceeding their face value. Such moves would be undesirable, but so would forcing Obama to renege on his two-year-old decision never to negotiate the debt ceiling again.

This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of Bloomberg View's editorial board or Bloomberg LP, its owners and investors.

To contact the author on this story:
Leonid Bershidsky at