Will Carly Fiorina's Tax Return Disclosure Pressure Other 2016 Candidates To Follow Suit?
Republican presidential candidate Carly Fiorina's decision to release two years of tax returns this week did more than reveal the former Hewlett-Packard CEO's $59 million fortune: The long-shot contender's move won her props for transparency and, more importantly, upped the pressure on other 2016 contenders to follow suit.
Fiorina's attention-getting move has the potential for being a game-changer. Joseph J. Thorndike, a historian and author who studies the political economy of American taxation, can't recall any other major candidate who has revealed so much about personal finances this early in the campaign cycle. Not so coincidentally, Fiorina's lavish disclosure comes at a time when Democratic front runner Hillary Clinton has been under fire for the complexity of her family's financial arrangements.
Fiorina's fellow Republican candidate, Ben Carson, filed his disclosure on Thursday.
Candidates for federal office and elected officials are legally required to file personal financial disclosures with the FEC to let the public know about any potential conflicts of interest. But the forms are notoriously vague (filers list their assets and liabilities in broad categories of value, rather than precise dollar amounts) and loophole-ridden (spousal income, while included, can prove difficult to parse, and home values don't have to be included). Over the years, many candidates for office—usually those with modest incomes and wealthy opponents—have chosen to go the extra mile by releasing tax returns. Fiorina stands out because she voluntarily listed her considerable holdings in exact dollar amounts without being pressured to do so.
"There's no law compelling disclosure but there's a lot of moral pressure we place on candidates," Thorndike noted. Richard Nixon was the first president to release his tax returns (while under investigation), Thorndike added, after which it became standard practice for presidents and, increasingly, candidates.
Stalling for time
No one enjoys turning over private documents for public scrutiny, and candidates often drop out of a presidential race before making such disclosures or wait until as late as possible before offering up the intimate details of their financial lives.
In 2012, Mitt Romney faced mounting pressure to disclose his returns from Republican rivals as well as Democrats before he buckled and released two years' worth. The reason for his stall was readily apparent: The returns provided ammunition for the Obama campaign, and its allies proceeded to hammer the wealthy former private equity executive for paying a lower effective tax rate (roughly 14 percent) than many middle-class Americans. The returns served to bolster the president's narrative about Romney as member of a wealthy elite that helps itself to upper-end tax breaks.
A former Romney campaign spokesman confirmed that the pressure to release the returns eventually became too much.
"We had Harry Reid lying on the floor of the Senate about Mitt Romney not paying taxes. And the press corps continued to push for the returns. It was a distraction for the campaign," said Ryan Williams.
Compared to the federally mandated personal financial disclosure forms, tax returns "shed more light on how certain policies might affect the candidate," said Dan Auble, a senior researcher at the nonpartisan Center for Responsive Politics. "Especially for the wealthy, whose finances tend to be more complicated, the tax return can provide context that informs debate." He noted that that tax returns include information that personal financial disclosure forms do not, such as tax deductions used by the candidate, charitable giving and real estate loans.
p>That may be cause some heartburn for wealthy longtime politicians like Clinton and Republican Jeb Bush—both of whom have released tax returns in the past but both of whom are believed to have become significantly wealthier since their last disclosures.
Between his first 1998 and 2002 gubernatorial races, Bush disclosed 20 years of returns. In 2002, his tax return revealed a nosedive in income once he took office. Now he's been out of office for decades and has reportedly made millions serving on corporate boards and giving speeches.
Clinton released seven years of tax returns during her 2008 run for the White House (in addition to more dating back to Bill Clinton's tenure as governor of Arkansas). But she hasn't released any since she became secretary of state in 2009; her more recent tax returns will surely generate interest given the recent spotlight on the mammoth speaker fees that she and her husband have been able to command since leaving office, turning them from a couple who was "dead broke," as Hillary Clinton controversially put it, upon leaving the White House, to multi-millionaires.
"There are a variety of reasons candidates may not want to release their tax returns. For instance, people who've had a lot of sophisticated tax advice about how to minimize their taxes might not want that on display for everyone to see," Thorndike said. "Anything that seems unusual to regular voters. Most of us have nothing close to that."
Other candidates who have made their returns public include Ted Cruz, who released five years worth of taxes in 2012, when he was running for election to the Senate; Rubio, who released nine years of returns during his 2010 Senate run; Rick Perry, who disclosed his taxes from 1987 to 2010; and George Pataki, who last released his returns in 1994.
"I believe that every serious candidate will release their tax returns," said Thorndike, though he argued that if past is prologue it could be "a good long while before anyone's under real pressure to do this."
Dave Levinthal of the Center for Public Integrity said the politics of tax returns aren't always earth-shaking. "Then again," he wrote in an e-mail, "to paraphrase Donald Rumsfeld, you don’t know what you don’t know."
—Richard Rubin, Ben Brody and Kendall Breitman contributed reporting.