Skip to content
Opinion
Jared Dillian

Junior Bankers Deserve Their Bonuses. Really.

Cutting payouts when inflation is already eroding their value will only hurt the morale of those lowest on the ladder. 

Video player cover image
The Debate Over the Stock Buyback Tax

Bonuses for junior bankers are a little smaller than they were last year, the mostly anonymous banking discussion board Wall Street Oasis revealed last week, and the junior bankers are not too happy about it. I worked on Wall Street for seven years, and I have observed many cycles in compensation. While the media is usually eager to report with some relish on declining pay — bankers are typically unsympathetic characters for much of America — the complaints from the young men and women who manipulate spreadsheets and do much of the manual labor in investment banking shouldn’t be dismissed out of hand.

Ordinarily a job with high prestige and high pay would result in a comfortable standard of living. And for sure, the pay is high — there are not many jobs out there that pay $200,000 a year for people in their 20s. But average rent has risen to $5,000 a month in Manhattan, and it’s difficult to find an apartment for less than that with anything in the way of amenities. That $60,000 in annual rent eats up about 30% of the typical paycheck, a lot goes to taxes, and there is not much left in the way of savings. I could make the argument that one of these bankers could work in say, South Carolina, make $60,000 a year, and enjoy a higher standard of living, but there would be a loss of prestige.