Hi all, it’s Eric. It was a frantic week in the conservative assault against one of the tech industry’s most prized legal shields.
Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas started things off soberly when he wrote that courts had interpreted Section 230 of the 1996 Communications Decency Act in a way that gave technology platforms much broader legal protections than required by law. Section 230 indemnifies tech platforms from lawsuits holding them responsible for things their users say. Thomas argued that the protections insulate platforms from the consequences of their own decisions, and that paring back the immunity would “give plaintiffs a chance to raise their claims.”