Skip to content
CityLab
Government

Cities Take Aim at the Spiraling Costs of Local Elections

Big money is flooding into elections on the local level. Cities like Denver, Baltimore, and Portland, Oregon, are some of the ones pushing back.
Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel had raised more than $10 million for his 2019 reelection campaign as of August but on September 4, he announced that he would not be running.
Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel had raised more than $10 million for his 2019 reelection campaign as of August but on September 4, he announced that he would not be running.Frank Polich/Reuters

It’s well known that a run for a big office needs big money backing it, but up and down the ballot, budgets have been swelling, and not only in the U.S.’s largest cities. Several localities—including Portland, Denver, and Baltimore—have initiatives in motion to overhaul the system either by driving down the dollar amounts each person can give or solicit, piloting public financing projects that make each donated dollar go further, or both. The overarching goal is to keep big money and its influence out of local politics, and to give all candidates a fair shot.

In Denver, voters will decide on an expansive reform package, including a contribution cap and a generous matching fund. Baltimore’s city council has unanimously passed a charter amendment that would create a similar small-dollar matching system, if Mayor Catherine Pugh approves it and passes it along to the fall ballot. And before Portland, Oregon, phases in its own public financing measure in 2020, voters will decide on a strict local contribution cap this November.