No Quick Fix for South Africa's Frail Economy When Zuma GoesBy
Zuma to step down as ANC leader in December, president in 2019
Successor needs to simultaneously boost growth, curb debt
Anyone who believes there’s a quick fix for South Africa’s political and financial malaise when President Jacob Zuma leaves office needs to think again.
His successor will inherit an economy that slid into recession in the first quarter, mismanaged state companies that are bleeding cash and a network of officials implicated in looting taxpayer funds. Efforts to reignite growth and rein in a 27.7 percent unemployment rate will be hamstrung by the Treasury’s commitment to curb public debt, which has more than tripled to 2 trillion rand ($153 billion) since Zuma came to power eight years ago.
“The whole process of fixing South Africa is probably going to take the best part of a decade,” Andre Duvenhage, a political science professor at North-West University in Potchefstroom, west of Johannesburg, said by phone. “This is not going to be an easy job. We are in for a long, difficult struggle.”
Zuma’s second and final term as president is due to end in 2019, but his political clout is waning as he prepares to relinquish the leadership of the ANC in December and, depending on who replaces him, he could be forced to step down early. The party’s new leader will also be its presidential candidate in the next elections.
Most investors are rooting for Deputy President Cyril Ramaphosa, a former labor union leader who helped draft the nation’s first democratic constitution and made a fortune in business. His main rival is Nkosazana Dlamini-Zuma, the former chairwoman of the African Union Commission and Zuma’s ex-wife. Parliamentary Speaker Baleka Mbete, Human Settlements Minister Lindiwe Sisulu and former ANC treasurer-general Mathews Phosa have also said they intend running for the post.
On the campaign trail, Ramaphosa, 64, has emphasized the need for economic growth, while Dlamini-Zuma, 68, has echoed Zuma’s calls for “radical economic transformation” to address racially based income disparities that date back to white-minority rule. Whoever wins has to halt the plunder of state resources, according to Pravin Gordhan, who Zuma fired as finance minister in March in a move that prompted two ratings companies to downgrade South Africa’s foreign-currency debt to junk.
“You can talk about radical this or radical that, it doesn’t really matter. Every single day that we allow the current trajectory to continue, there is huge damage,” Gordhan said in a panel discussion in Cape Town this month. With a different leadership approach, “we can turn this country around in six months, not in terms of achieving five percent growth, but building a platform on which that process can actually begin,” he said.
The central bank expects the economy to expand 0.5 percent this year and 1.2 percent in 2018. Zuma’s successor could lift the growth rate to 3 percent within two years by bolstering investor confidence and addressing regulatory uncertainty, but the state will have little scope to provide stimulus itself, according to Lumkile Monde, an economics lecturer at the University of Witwatersrand in Johannesburg.
“The new administration will have to adopt very prudent fiscal policies to ensure that we can service the debt we have accumulated and also send a message to society that we cannot live beyond our means,” he said. “It’s going to be a long haul and will require lots of sacrifices and bold leadership, not only from the state but also from business and broader society.”
Weaker-than-expected economic growth is likely to curb tax revenue this year, making it difficult for the Treasury to meet its target of slashing the budget gap to less than 3 percent of gross domestic product. After having raised tax rates for two of the last three years, the government may have to lower spending to stop the deficit from widening.
Scandals, policy missteps and controversial appointments have been the hallmarks of Zuma’s tenure and caused deep divisions within the ruling African National Congress.
The nation’s graft ombudsman alleged in a November report that he allowed members of the wealthy Gupta family, who are in business with his son, to influence cabinet appointments and the award of state contracts. And a study released in March by a team of academics concluded that Zuma, the Guptas and their allies had orchestrated “a silent coup,” securing control over key positions in the state, enabling them to allegedly steal billions of rand. Zuma and the Guptas deny wrongdoing.
Power utility Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd. and port and rail operator Transnet SOC Ltd. are among state companies that have been caught up in the scandal. Reports by the graft ombudsman and the academics implicated some of their top management and board members in aiding the alleged looting. Both companies have said they are investigating the accusations.
South Africa must undertake major structural reforms, including imposing greater fiscal discipline, selling inefficient state companies and shrinking the state’s role in the economy if it’s to put itself back on track, according to Steve Hanke, a professor of applied economics at Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore.
“The current trajectory is just that sinking feeling,” Hanke said by phone. “If you had a clear agenda for reform and followed through, I think South Africa would just boom. They could easily double their GDP per capita over roughly 15 to 20 years.”
— With assistance by Ana Monteiro