G-7 ministers pull statement; U.S. objects to climate mention
All other six nations continue to support Paris accord
A rift between U.S. President Donald Trump and the rest of the Group of Seven over his hard-line position on climate change looks set to widen next month when leaders meet in Italy.
Energy ministers from Canada, France, Germany and others members of the G-7 took the unusual step of declining to issue a joint statement after a meeting in Rome Monday, saying the U.S. wasn’t ready to endorse language upholding the Paris Agreement.
The move gives the Trump administration time to determine whether to follow through on a campaign pledge to abandon the landmark climate agreement, brokered in 2015 by more than 190 nations. It also indicates that other nations are unwilling to drop climate change from the G-7 agenda, setting up a potential showdown when Trump attends his first summit with other world leaders in Taormina, Sicily, on May 26-27.
“The leaders’ summit is the deadline,” said Alden Meyer, who has followed international climate talks for two decades as director of policy at the Union of Concerned Scientists. “If President Trump walks into that meeting saying he still doesn’t have a position, I think that would be the end of the line for the other countries.”
The potential confrontation comes as world leaders have been largely silent as Trump, who has called global warming a hoax, has issued sweeping orders to gut environmental regulations. The president plans to determine next month whether to pull the U.S. out of the Paris agreement.
Instead of publicly confronting Trump, Germany and others have tried to use international pressure at G-7 and G-20 meetings to convince his cabinet members to work with the rest of the world to fight climate change. G-7 nations hold significant leverage. Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan and the U.K. are among America’s most important economic and military allies.
“They are not going to let this be brushed under the rug,” Todd Stern, who helped shape the Paris accord as U.S. special envoy for climate change under President Barack Obama, said in an interview. “Climate change is a consequential issue, and Paris is the international expression of it. They are not going to paper that over.”
As host of this year’s G-7 meetings, Italy pushed to include language supporting the Paris accord in a joint statement drafted for this week’s meeting of energy ministers. Past communiques have included similar language, but U.S. Energy Secretary Rick Perry objected, saying Trump had not made up his mind, according to a G-7 negotiator.
Rather than rewriting the statement to appease the U.S., the other nations scrapped it altogether. In its place, Italy issued a statement of its own. It singled out the U.S., saying America was ”reviewing many of its policies and reserves its position on this issue.” All other G-7 members remain committed to the Paris accord, according to the statement.
“On Paris, it was impossible to sign a joint declaration because United States were not ready to take a clear position,” said Tiziana D’Angelo, a spokeswoman for Italy’s minister of economic development.
In a statement issued after the meeting, Perry said it was important for nations to continue developing fossil fuel generation -- including coal -- as well as clean energy. He made no direct mention of the Paris accord.
“I discussed with my fellow Ministers that the Trump Administration believes that economic growth and the environment can successfully go hand-in-hand,” Perry said in the statement.
Walking away from the Paris accord could isolate the U.S. on multiple fronts, John Kirton, director of the University of Toronto’s G-8 Research Group, said in an interview.
“Trump needs them to stand against Russia, China, ISIS -- you name it,” Kirton said. “Time is on the side of the G-7.”
Adding and removing passages from communiques are part and parcel of international diplomacy. It would be unprecedented, however, if the U.S. ultimately refuses to sign onto a joint statement backed by all other members.
“That would be a pretty striking development,” Meyer said. “The Trump administration is aware that it would put them under a pretty intense spotlight, isolated from the rest of the G-7.”
— With assistance by Ari Natter