How China Is Reshaping Market Correlations in Asia
How big is China's influence on Asian assets?
Investors seeking an answer to the question have some new figures to mull over.
China's increasing trade and financial heft has ramped up correlations in equity and currency markets in Asia in recent years, challenging diversification strategies for investors as new — and increasingly complex — feedback loops emerge.
On Monday, a report from the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) — which its authors say is the first attempt to systematically examine China's impact on Asian financial markets through regression models — concluded that the country's influence on regional equity markets has risen to a level close to that of the U.S. in non-stress periods. The study, written by Chang Shu, Dong He, Jinyue Dong and Honglin Wang, found that the yuan's exchange rate relative to the U.S. dollar also increasingly drives the outlook for regional currencies.
The results echo an IMF report last month, which showed that the co-movements of Asian and Chinese equity and currency markets have jumped since the global financial crisis (with the notable exception of bond markets, given their relatively-closed nature in the world's second-largest economy.) In short, China is the new Japan, the IMF report concludes, referring to the former's regional influence on currency and equity markets.
As capital markets become increasingly globalized, correlations have naturally risen in recent years, exacerbated by risk on/risk off strategies, carry trades, cross-asset arbitrage techniques, and the herding behavior of foreign investors in emerging markets.
The two studies strike a different note, however, ascribing rising asset-class correlations in the region to changing real-economy dynamics in China. Shifts in the Chinese exchange rate and the stock market have a statistically significant impact on regional counterparts as "China's economic and financial developments affect investors' assessment of the region as a whole and fund flows to the region as a whole," the authors of the BIS report write.
While the conclusion sounds intuitive, the report seeks to put a firm figure on correlation trends across asset classes, using historic market data over a sweeping time frame, from January 2002 to end-September 2013.
The BIS report formally establishes how China is driving regional markets — including Hong Kong, Singapore, Indonesia, South Korea, Malaysia, Philippines, and Thailand — by deploying a popular statistical model known as structural vector autoregression, or VAR.
It finds that one positive U.S. equity market shock triggers a 0.14 percent rise in Asian stock prices upon impact, compared with 0.12 percent in the case of a Chinese equity shock. The impact in both cases strengthens in the second day, and dies down after three days. The cumulative impacts are 0.39 percent versus 0.35 percent, respectively, over the three-day period. Asian currencies are also moved by yuan shocks, as well as U.S. equity shifts.
"The positive spillovers from the renminbi to Asian currencies indicate that China may be acting as a regional 'pull' force: a rise in relative demand for the Chinese economy would also boost the relative demand for Asian economies, leading to appreciation of Asian currencies," the economists explain.
Variance decomposition — a method to indicate the relative importance of a single variable driving the total variance in a series — illustrates the point more starkly. The study shows the short-term volatility of Asian stock prices is mainly driven by spillovers from U.S. equities at 40.3 percent, but that's closely followed by Chinese equities at 35.8 percent, with the latter's influence notably increasing since the global financial crisis.
The authors conclude that: "Such a rise in China's influence may be due to some increase in China's financial linkages with Asian economies. Yet at China’s current level of capital account opening, it is more likely a reflection of China's importance in the real economy such that developments in China’s financial markets can be interpreted as shocks to its real economy and thus can drive investor sentiment towards regional financial markets."
However, China's bond shocks have no influence on regional fixed-income markets, given the yuan's modest role in cross-border financing and the country's still relatively closed capital account, the study concludes.
Striking a similar note, the IMF report observes that the rising co-movement of Asian and Chinese markets, across equity, currency, and bond markets, is in line with the increasing correlation of Asian business cycles.