Nigeria Oil Contracts Review Adds to Industry Uncertaintyby
Drop in oil prices is putting pressure on government revenue
Deep offshore production accounts for about half of output
Plans by Nigeria, Africa’s biggest oil producer, to review offshore production contracts signed with international oil companies two decades ago, have added to uncertainty in an industry already lacking regulatory clarity, said analysts including Philippe de Pontet of Eurasia Group.
The objective is to increase Nigeria’s earnings from the fields, according to Emmanuel Kachikwu, group managing director of the Nigerian National Petroleum Corp. Yet, declining crude oil prices take away some of the incentive for investments that would’ve given the government more leverage in negotiations.
“With Brent below $50 a barrel, the timing is not ripe for big contract negotiations.,” de Pontet said. “If the administration is not careful its agitation for contract review could prove counterproductive at a time when the oil sector is already stagnant at best.”
Nigeria depends on crude exports for two-thirds of government revenue and more than 90 percent of export earnings. NNPC, as the state oil company is known, has production-sharing contracts in deep offshore oilfields with companies including Royal Dutch Shell Plc, Exxon Mobil Corp., Chevron Corp., Total SA, and Eni SpA. Output from these fields now account for about half of Nigeria’s production of about 2 million barrels a day.
The fiscal terms were negotiated at a time when these companies were pioneering deep offshore production, and fields such as Shell’s Bonga, Exxon’s Erha, Chevron’s Agbami and Total’s Amenam got tax rates of about 50 percent, compared with 85 percent for onshore fields. The royalty regimes varied from 12 percent for water depths of 200-500 meters (650-1,600 feet) to nothing once they exceeded 1,000 meters.
With government revenue halved by the decline of crude prices in the past year, President Muhammadu Buhari, who took power after winning an election this year, is hard-pressed to fund electoral promises. Kachikwu has identified review of the fiscal terms governing offshore oil fields as one area where the government has scope to increase income. Kachikwu, who was also nominated as a minister by the president, is expected to work closely as a junior minister with Buhari, who plans to keep the oil portfolio, in shaping industry policy.
Though the production-sharing contracts are “fairly beneficial” to the companies, it may be better for the government to push through with a revised oil bill, Philipp Chladek, a London-based analyst at Bloomberg Intelligence, said by phone on Oct. 5.
Putting in place a new law “is a bigger and more pressing priority than renegotiating the offshore contracts because it will have a much more beneficial impact on the Nigerian economy,” he said. “The upside from having a regulatory and legal system in place is considerable because it will help increase investment and enable the smaller companies to develop their onshore oilfields.”
It’s not yet clear if the latest round of talks with the international oil companies will offer a way out of the prolonged deadlock with the government that arose over a proposed bill to reform the way the industry is funded and regulated, first sent to lawmakers in 2008. The major difference was over the fiscal terms governing the offshore fields, where the government wanted a greater share of revenue.
“There’s too much uncertainty and that would be made worse by the government trying to renegotiate these contracts,” Raj Kulasingam, a London-based lawyer covering energy at Dentons UKMEA LLP, said by phone on Thursday. “The only time the government is able to get something out of these negotiations is if there’s a win-win for both.”
While the bill was stalled in parliament in the past seven years, investments worth more than $50 billion that should’ve come to Nigeria went elsewhere amid the uncertainty, according to Shell. As much as $150 billion in investments could be lost in 10 years and output might decline by 25 percent, according to the Oil Producers Trade Section of the Lagos Chamber of Commerce, which represents oil companies in Nigeria.
Drilling for exploration in Nigeria is close to the lowest in more than a decade because of shelved investment plans, according to the Petroleum Ministry.
The last draft sent to lawmakers in 2011 seeks to raise offshore taxes to 73 percent and those for onshore to 87 percent. Two previous drafts sent to parliament didn’t become law during the tenure of the last two legislatures due to political wrangling and opposition from energy producers.
Favorable fiscal terms had encouraged Shell to lead deep-water oil exploration in Nigeria, resulting in the 1995 discovery of the Bonga field, located 120 kilometers (75 miles) offshore. With reserve estimates of about 1 billion barrels, it has capacity for 220,000 barrels daily, pumping into a floating production, storage and off-loading vessel moored in the sea.
Other discoveries quickly followed Bonga, confirming the prodigious prospects of the Gulf of Guinea, helping spur a movement to offshore oil in Nigeria at a time of rising unrest and armed militancy in the Niger River delta that imperiled onshore production. Shell, the largest producer in Nigeria, has since sold most of its onshore fields that were plagued by theft, sabotage and insecurity.
The international oil companies concerned have already begun discussions with the NNPC, which represents the government, according to Osagie Okunbor, Shell Nigeria chairman. Ogechukwu Udeagha, a spokesman for Exxon Mobil’s Nigerian unit in Lagos, declined to comment when contacted by Bloomberg. Chevron, Total and Eni officials didn’t immediately respond to e-mailed requests for comment.
None of the parties involved in the negotiations “wants to see this have an adverse impact on investments,” Okunbor said in Abuja on Sept 30. “So we will look at these clauses and then we will take a position. I don’t think that we should begin to see it at this stage as win and lose.”