Bank Regulators Set for London Showdown on Too-Big-to-Failby
U.S., Germany Pitted Against Japan, France on TLAC Standard
FSB Rules May Hit Deposit-Heavy Banks Like HSBC Hardest
Divided global bank regulators are preparing for a showdown on rules intended to make sure taxpayers won’t be on the hook when one of the world’s biggest lenders fails.
The Financial Stability Board holds a plenary meeting in London on Sept. 25 to finish work on total loss-absorbing capacity, or TLAC. Nations such as the U.S. and Germany, which are pushing for the toughest possible rules, are pitted against Japan, France and others that prefer a softer line, according to three people with knowledge of the matter, who asked not to be identified because the talks are private.
Whichever camp prevails, it may be deposit-reliant behemoths such as JPMorgan Chase & Co. and Wells Fargo & Co., rather than risk-addicted investment banks, that get hit the hardest. Some analysts view that as an incongruous result, given that the FSB was created by the Group of 20 nations six years ago to help stamp out the “reckless behavior” by banks that led to the financial crisis.
The FSB’s draft rules on TLAC require lenders to have capital and debt equivalent to at least 16 percent to 20 percent of their risk-weighted assets available to take losses. If the final number is at the low end of that range, most of the world’s biggest banks would have little trouble complying. A top-end number would force many lenders -- especially those most dependent on deposits for funding -- to issue billions of dollars of new debt, according to analysts.
“The big deposit-funded institutions may have to issue more bonds than they would like to,” said Robert Montague, a credit analyst at ECM Asset Management in London. “It’s one of the perverse outcomes of this regulation.”
While a compromise has been proposed, one of the people familiar with the talks said a decision in London is far from certain and the FSB may have to ask G-20 leaders to resolve the dispute.
Assuming the TLAC requirement is set at 20 percent, JPMorgan and Wells Fargo will have to issue the most securities to reach the goal -- about $85 billion and $65 billion, respectively, according to Paul Smillie, a Singapore-based credit analyst at ColumbiaThreadneedle. Analysts at CreditSights in New York put the net shortfall at both banks at about $50 billion.
HSBC Holdings Plc has a shortfall of more than $44 billion if the requirement is set at the top of the range, according to an Aug. 24 presentation on its website. That’s largely because the lender’s Hong Kong unit would need to issue $26.6 billion of new debt. While setting the requirement at 16 percent reduces the group shortfall to $12.6 billion, compliance would still cost as much as $300 million a year, the bank said.
While depositors left their money in JPMorgan, HSBC and Wells Fargo, allowing them to get through the 2008 crisis largely unscathed, Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley struggled to survive as institutions dumped their debt. Yet aspects of the TLAC rules are particularly tough on the deposit-taking banks with large loan books.
In addition to the requirement tied to risk-weighted assets, an Aug. 24 draft of the TLAC rules proposes a leverage-ratio requirement of 6 percent, or twice the minimum leverage ratio set by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. The leverage ratio, intended as a backstop for risk-sensitive capital standards, is calculated by dividing a bank’s Tier 1 capital by total consolidated assets, expressed as a percentage and taking no account of risk.
The draft rules also state that the sum of a bank’s “tier 1 and tier 2 regulatory capital instruments in the form of debt liabilities plus other eligible TLAC that is not also eligible as regulatory capital” should be at least 33 percent of its minimum TLAC requirement.
In its response to the FSB’s proposal, HSBC expressed concern that “banks which have genuinely low-risk balance sheets may be prejudiced by the use of the leverage ratio as a metric to determine TLAC.”
This strength in deposits helped banks like JPMorgan and Wells Fargo survive the financial crisis in relatively good shape, and their credit ratings bear this out. That’s even after the ratings companies have had to reshape their methodologies as regulators sought to eliminate the implied state subsidy for too-big-to-fail banks. Both lenders are among the highest-rated in developed economies.
Smillie of ColumbiaThreadneedle said that if the FSB “plumps for 20 percent,” the U.S. and Asian banks will be the losers. HSBC and Standard Chartered Plc can be viewed as Asian banks, given the nature of their businesses, he said.
The biggest European universal banks may be less affected by the demands because governments, including those of Germany and Italy, are pushing through legal changes that will allow their existing senior debt to be used to satisfy regulators’ demands.
“For the Europeans, if they manage to adopt legislation that allows the current stock of senior to count, then there is very little net new issuance to do,” Smillie said. “Most major European banks are there or thereabouts already.”
Banco Santander SA of Spain said in a presentation on Thursday it has a total shortfall approaching 28 billion euros. While that looks like a large amount, each year Santander issues as much as 53 billion euros of senior debt, making 28 billion euros “a quite manageable level for Santander,” according to the presentation.
Even the lenders with the most to do will be given time to issue the necessary debt, meaning the process shouldn’t be too disruptive, said Steve Hussey, an analyst at AllianceBernstein in London. The FSB has said the requirement won’t be in force earlier than 2019. A phase-in period has also been proposed.
“The point is that there will be a transition period,” said Hussey. “Yes, if you tell them to do it right now, you get some enormous numbers. But most banks are already close to 16 percent and, while there are clearly going to be some with a lot of issuance to do, the transitional period should make it fairly straightforward.”
Bundesbank Executive Board member Andreas Dombret said Germany supports a “high minimum requirement” for TLAC to ensure the credibility of the standard. He also underscored the importance of getting it right.
“TLAC is an essential element in solving the too-big-to-fail problem,” Dombret said. “Many people in the debate forget how crucial this is.