Fed Angst Gives Stock Traders Reason to Doubt Profit Bounce

Updated on
  • Equity traders left guessing about the future of global growth
  • Lamenting a lost chance to finally get rate increase over with

How Traders Are Feeling After the Fed Decision

They didn’t raise rates. Do they know something?

Among U.S. stock investors, imaginations are racing over whether the Federal Reserve’s refusal to boost interest rates says more about their view of the world economy than they are letting on. While equity bulls are happy for more months of zero-percent stimulus, a bigger issue is whether inaction bespeaks deeper concern about global growth at a time when corporate earnings have stopped going up in the U.S.

In typically frenetic trading, the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index ended Thursday with a loss, declining 0.3 percent and erasing a rally that reached 1.3 percent at the beginning of Janet Yellen’s press conference. Gains evaporated as the Fed chair spoke about the potential for stress in emerging markets to spill into the U.S. The gauge tumbled 1.2 percent at 9:35 a.m. in New York.

“That they didn’t start today and continue to wait still gives caution that the underlying economy around the world isn’t as strong as they like to see,” said David Lyon, global investment specialist at JP Morgan Private Bank, which oversees about $1 trillion. “This becomes three months of additional time where the Fed decision is still the black cloud overhanging the market.”

Another black cloud is not what equity traders were hoping for after corporate profits fell in the second quarter even as profit-based valuations reached the highest in five years. Since the third quarter of 2014, gains in quarterly income have averaged 3 percent in the S&P 500, down from 17 percent since the bull market began.

Profit for companies in the S&P 500 will not grow this year, according to strategists at Barclays Plc. in a note released after the Fed decision. Citing the threat of slower global growth and the strong dollar, the firm cut its estimate for earnings per share in the benchmark index from $123 to $117.

“The Fed yesterday wasn’t a catalyst to lower the estimate but it was confirmation that growth in China is slowing significantly,” Eric Slover, an equity strategist at Barclays, said by phone.

Among other things, inaction by the Fed puts the focus back on concerns such as China’s economy and plunging commodities, stresses that sparked a selloff in mid-August that at its worst erased more than $7 trillion from global equity values.

“The market will quickly turn around and say, hold on a minute, if they can’t raise rates with unemployment where it is, then you’re really worried about the potential impact with what’s going in emerging markets and commodities and so on,” Stewart Richardson, chief investment officer at RMG Wealth Management LLP in London said Wednesday. “If they cant do it now, they’ll never be able to do it.”

The Fed’s statement warned that economic and financial developments around the world may restrain economic activity and curb inflation. Yellen mentioned the outflow of capital from developing countries and pressures on emerging market currencies in her Q&A session.

Bad News

The refusal to hike was bad news for a significant constituency of traders who hoped Yellen and her colleagues would get the first rate increase over with as a way of affirming faith in the U.S. No increase underpins concern that policy makers doubt that momentum seen in everything from American gross domestic product to retail sales will prove durable.

“I’m completely and utterly bored sick of the whole thing and I think that it’s completely irrelevant whether the Fed raises rates by 25 basis points,” David Hussey, head of European equities at Manulife Asset Management in London, said before the decision. “What is important is, is China really blowing up, is a recession about to happen in emerging markets, what’s going to happen to commodity prices?”

Hike or not, the outcome of Thursday’s meeting is sure to test resolve in an American equity market where the third-longest bull market on record has recently ground to a halt. The S&P 500, up almost 200 percent in the 70 months through December, has fallen 3.3 percent this year, including its first 10 percent correction since 2011.


As the trend turned, U.S. shares have changed from being among of the world’s best investments, from 2010 to 2014, to rank also-rans. Over the first 5 1/2 years of the bull market the S&P 500 beat the MSCI All-Country World Index by more than 60 percentage points, rallying 204 percent through 2014. Since the start of 2015, the U.S. index is down about the same as the global gauge.

“There could well be fears that it is due to a weakening growth environment, which will send a negative tone to equity markets,” said Pau Morilla-Giner, the chief investment officer at London & Capital Group Ltd. “This feels like a Catch 22 situation especially when one considers the low sentiment-high fear factor dominating equity markets currently.”

VIX plunged and recovered intraday

Thursday’s reaction extended the worst equity rout since 2011, a stretch dating to mid-August that began with concern over China’s market meltdown and worsened as commodity prices tumbled and the dollar surged, potentially crimping profits at exporters. Even after rising in four of the five days before Thursday, the S&P 500 is down 5.3 percent since Aug. 17.

Investors in the pro-rate hike camp point out that stocks have weathered Fed tightenings in the past. Since 1946, following the initiation of 12 tightening cycles defined by Ned Davis Research, the S&P 500 was higher a year later eight times and posted an average 12-month return of 2.5 percent.

But past tightenings also began when the stock market was much less turbulent than it is now. Over the month leading up to the 12 cycles since World War II, the S&P 500’s average daily move, a rough measure of volatility, was less than 0.6 percent -- 15 percent lower than usual. While some investors said that meant markets were too unsettled to hike, the alternative could be worse.

“The Fed’s mandate isn’t to cause stock returns,” George Schultze, who oversees $200 million as founder and managing member of Schultze Assset Management in Purchase, New York, said by phone. “We’re due for a higher rate now. If inflation continues to climb because interest rate policy is too aggressive for too long, it’s a bigger risk for stocks.”

— With assistance by Lu Wang, Inyoung Hwang, and Camila Russo

    Before it's here, it's on the Bloomberg Terminal. LEARN MORE