German Ruling on EU Bailout Fund Seen as Tinkering Not TrashingKarin Matussek
Before European Union judges weigh in on the crisis bond-buying plan, Germany’s highest court will wrap up the final issues regarding the European Stability Mechanism, the other part of measures taken as a response to euro-area debt crisis.
The court gave preliminary approval to the legality of the 500 billion-euro ($695 billion) ESM in September 2012 and cleared the way for the fiscal pact, a deficit-control treaty designed to impose budget discipline on European Union members, in September 2012.
Germany’s highest court will rule tomorrow on issues including how much say the country’s lawmakers must have in the ESM. The Federal Constitutional Court in Karlsruhe will also decide whether the country must take precautions to prevent losing its voting rights among the ESM governing bodies if it fails to pay its contribution to the fund.
Until January, the lawsuits also included challenges against the European Central Bank’s Outright Monetary Transactions program on buying unlimited quantities of crisis state bonds. The German judges decided to separate that part and send it to Europe’s top court to get its interpretation of EU treaty rules at stake. Tomorrow’s ruling won’t have any effect on the OMT.
Christoph Herrmann, a law professor at Germany’s Passau University, said the ruling won’t change the fundamental plan.
“The basic setup of the ESM and the fiscal pact won’t be touched after the court allowed Germany to ratify both instruments,” he said. “The judges may order some changes of the domestic laws governing the handling of the ESM here, but nothing that would put the rescue operation dramatically into question.”
The German court will also address whether the nation’s full parliament, as opposed to the budget committees or subcommittees, must decide on issues regarding how Germany’s representatives vote as an ESM governing country.
The eight judges hearing the lawsuits at the Karlsruhe-based court dismissed motions in the case in September 2012 that sought to block ratifying the ESM, while ruling Germany’s 190 billion-euro contribution can’t be increased without legislative approval. The court allowed Germany to ratify the ESM if it included binding caveats that it won’t be forced to assume higher liabilities without its consent.
The German government complied with these requirements and the ESM and the fiscal pact took effect.
The cases were filed after German lawmakers in mid-2012 approved the ESM and the fiscal pact. About 37,000 people signed up to endorse a constitutional complaint filed by political group “Mehr Demokratie e.V.” Other plaintiffs included opposition party Die Linke, as well as Peter Gauweiler, a lawmaker from Merkel’s CSU Bavarian sister party.