Turning Pristine U.S. Public Lands Into Solar Energy FarmsKen Wells
With most domestic issues, it’s hard for an administration to bypass Congress and still affect policy. That’s not true for energy.
Former President George W. Bush’s 2001 energy task force was supposed to write policy recommendations, then disbanded after environmentalists learned of the group’s secret meetings with the oil and gas industry and sued.
Bush pressed ahead a different way, using his Interior secretary, a former lawyer for fossil-fuel interests, to carry out his oil-driven agenda and ramp up drilling on publicly owned lands.
For the last four years, President Barack Obama has used the same executive powers to reduce Interior’s focus on oil and enact his own green agenda, as reported in Bloomberg Businessweek’s March 29 issue. Under outgoing Department of the Interior Secretary Ken Salazar, the administration has on average sold 1,000 fewer leases annually for drilling on public lands than Bush, according to data compiled by the Institute for Energy Research, a Washington-based organization.
Companies peddling green energy projects, on the other hand, are enjoying unprecedented access to the 248 million acres overseen by Interior’s Bureau of Land Management. In mid-March, Salazar greenlighted three massive, privately funded clean energy developments on federal properties.
A Duke Energy subsidiary will erect 90 towering turbines on a wind farm about 60 miles southeast of Las Vegas, while McCoy Solar and EDF Renewable Energy will each build solar plants in the southern Mojave Desert of California, home to the sun-sanded vistas of Joshua Tree National Park.
When the 7,700-acre McCoy development is complete, the Interior Department says, it will be one of the largest solar projects in the world. That’s in addition to 18 other utility-scale solar plants, seven more wind farms and nine geothermal facilities that Salazar has approved for development over the next 5 to 10 years on property managed by the BLM in six states.
Altogether, the 37 projects will provide green power to more than 3.8 million homes.
While Bush’s agenda had the full backing of the fossil fuel industry, the Obama administration has had to convince environmentalists that green energy expansion is worth tearing up pristine public deserts.
Groups such as the Sierra Club and Natural Resources Defense Council, worried that Interior’s plans impinge on wildlife habitats, blessed the strategy only after Salazar agreed to scale back solar development to 285,000 acres, instead of 677,000 acres as first planned.
Smaller groups are still skeptical. They wonder why the administration is giving up hundreds of thousands of acres of untrammeled desert when its own Environmental Protection Agency in 2011 identified 80,000 to 250,000 abandoned mine sites on federal lands that would be suitable for large-scale solar and wind projects.
A coalition led by the Seattle-based Western Lands Project is suing Interior in federal court, seeking to force it to divert its solar and wind projects to the degraded lands.
The groups also want the agency to scrap plans that leave 19 million additional acres up for grabs for future buildouts. Interior is turning protected parcels “into permanent industrial zones,” says Janine Blaeloch, head of the Western Lands Project. “It’s the attitude of administrations in the past -- the desert becomes a dumping ground for whatever large projects you have out there.”
Interior says the lawsuit is without merit. The agency plans to approve 23 more renewable energy projects this year or next, which would power 1.65 million more homes, so long as incoming Secretary Sally Jewell doesn’t change course.
Daniel Kish, senior vice president for policy at IER, which receives funding from the fossil fuel industry, is no fan of Obama’s energy strategy. But Kish can’t quarrel with how Obama’s carried out his agenda.
“It’s fair to say that past administrations have used the federal estate to further their energy vision,” says Kish. “Obama is no different.”
To continue reading this article you must be a Bloomberg Professional Service Subscriber.
If you believe that you may have received this message in error please let us know.