American Airlines Is on the Wrong Flight PathJeffrey Pfeffer
When American Airlines filed for bankruptcy last November, the thought was the company would try to shed workers and costs. This April, American revealed its plans: cutting 13,000 employees, eliminating its pension plans, and reducing health benefits. This provoked, not surprisingly, strong resistance from the unions, which included demonstrations at airports and the company’s annual meeting and also a move to get US Airways to make a bid for the carrier.
Analysts had been urging such moves for a while, but there’s only one problem: High labor costs are almost certainly not the most important source of American’s, or for that matter the U.S. airline industry’s, problems.
Consult the American Customer Satisfaction Index and you will discover the airline industry is tied with newspapers for the lowest level of customer satisfaction. Yes, even subscription television and wireless service, banks, and the U.S. Postal Service have higher customer service scores than airlines do. Within the airline industry, American ranks higher than Delta and United but well, well behind Southwest. Research by ACSI founder and former Michigan business school professor Claes Fornell finds that companies which score higher on the customer satisfaction surveys do better in their stock performance.
That’s no surprise. As Fred Reichheld pointed out in The Loyalty Effect long ago, financial performance comes from customer retention, because it is less expensive to keep your existing customers than attract new ones and it is easier to sell more products and services to your current customers where you already have a relationship. Reichheld went on to note that strong customer relationships come from long-tenured, engaged, motivated employees—the people who actually keep the customers happy, or, as in the case of many of the airlines, do the opposite.
Southwest Airlines, the only airline to have been profitable every year for the past 40, actually pays its employees more and has never had a layoff or a furlough, even in the tumultuous period following 9/11. You can be low-cost even if your labor rates aren’t the lowest, because it turns out labor costs are a function of two things—what people are paid and what they do. If I don’t pay you much but you don’t do anything, or maybe even sabotage operations, I haven’t actually saved any money.
The idea that American is going to cut its way to profitability is ridiculous. A survey by the International Air Transport Assn. (the industry’s trade group) shows that people are trying to avoid flying because the experience is so poor and many of the airlines’ best customers have gone, when they can, to flying privately. The problem with American Airlines, as with the U.S. industry—and in fact many businesses—is not that its costs are too high but that its revenues are too low. Making the flying experience worse by fighting with the people who deliver that service doesn’t seem like a sensible prescription for success.
As for flying on American, when a recent flight to Dallas was diverted to Amarillo and I wound up getting a ride with a fellow passenger in the middle of the night so I could make my event the next day, what did American do for me? Nothing, because it wasn’t the company’s fault. Well, that’s actually not quite true. Since I had only flown to Amarillo (although the flight was to Dallas), you guessed it, on my mileage statement I only got mileage to Amarillo. American “saved” some 300 miles. Just the sort of ephemeral “savings” it’s going to get from its workers.