Melting Glaciers Means Poor Harvests?John Carey
The facts are indisputable and sobering. The glaciers in the Himalayas and Tibetan plateau are melting. Those glaciers feed mighty rivers like the Ganges in India and the Yellow River and Yangtze in China. Those rivers, in turn, help irrigate the wheat and rice fields of those two countries, which are the leading grain producers in the world.
By some estimates these glaciers could be gone within 30 years. Why is that important? Consider the Ganges. Since 70% of the water in the river in the dry season comes from meltwater, the disappearance of the glaciers means that the Ganges could become a seasonal river, says Lester Brown, president of the Earth Policy Institute. “I’ve tried to imagine what would happen to 400 million people living in the Ganges river basin if the river stops flowing,” Brown says.
One obvious result: a severe strain on agriculture, not just in India but also China. And it would come at a time when world grain stocks are already at their lowest level on record. “The world has never faced a potentially predictable reduction in grain harvest as we are now looking at with the melting of the glaciers,” Brown says. That’s why Brown is one of many voices called for immediate action to combat global warming by reducing greenhouse gas emissions.
To continue reading this article you must be a Bloomberg Professional Service Subscriber.
If you believe that you may have received this message in error please let us know.
- Comedian Byron Allen Buys the Weather Channel for $300 Million
- Stocks Tumble in Biggest Weekly Decline Since 2016: Markets Wrap
- Musk Takes Down the Tesla and SpaceX Facebook Pages
- World's Biggest Cryptocurrency Exchange Is Heading to Malta
- A Horror Week for the Dow Has Investors Begging for Trump Respite