Mergers Are No Menace
Merger mania hit a new peak in 1998, with $2.5 trillion worth of deals announced worldwide. This year promises to be even hotter. There are all kinds of reasons why companies merge, but one underlying macroeconomic force driving the phenomenon is glut. After a decade of huge capital investments in Asia, the U.S., and elsewhere, supply outpaces demand nearly everywhere. This is sending prices lower, eroding corporate profits, and increasing layoffs. Mergers, especially among big, like-size companies, are the market's way of reducing supply. Antitrust policy must focus on maintaining competition. But with the global economy facing a deflationary spiral, leeway should be given to some mergers that cut back overcapacity.
To continue reading this article you must be a Bloomberg Professional Service Subscriber.
If you believe that you may have received this message in error please let us know.
- Smartphones Are Killing Americans, But Nobody’s Counting
- Turns Out It Will Be Congress’s Fault When Stocks Crash
- Why a Pub in the Middle of Nowhere Was Named the World’s Best Restaurant
- Facebook and Google Helped Anti-Refugee Campaign in Swing States
- Ford to Take $267 Million Hit From Recall of F-Series Trucks